Live data from Hacker News

Ask HN: Why is there no P2P streaming protocol like BitTorrent?

news.ycombinator.com

11–20 of 231 posts

Re: Ask HN: Why is there no P2P streaming protocol like BitTorrent?

#13

Earlier quoted context omitted.

looks interesting! surprised something like that never caught on. I looking for something like Twitch basically. It has really good quality and is live. But obviously Twitch is just losing money and using all Amazons resources so I wanted to see if there's a more sustainable p2p approach

What do you mean by never caught on? It's 'live' at https://joinpeertube.org/ where you can either go to https://joinpeertube.org/browse-content and put something into that search form, or limit that search to specific 'instances' under https://joinpeertube.org/instances Or to get back to your original question: https://docs.joinpeertube.org/use/create-upload-video edit: Your'e not limited to these addresses, for one…

Thanks! i will just check it out.

I just meant like never caught on as in like it's not super popular, but looks like it's on the come up. would be nice to have a real youtube competitor lol

Re: Ask HN: Why is there no P2P streaming protocol like BitTorrent?

#16
The only entities that could use such a thing are major streaming platforms, and projects trying to stream copyrighted content without consent.

The former don't want to use it as it degrades their control over the content, and the later don't want to make a new system cause systems that are built on torrents are good enough.

Re: Ask HN: Why is there no P2P streaming protocol like BitTorrent?

#20
There was Joost in 2008, from Skype founders. Skype was originally P2P until Microsoft acquisition and killing this legally questionable feature - need to feed the big brother (: Joost raised ~$50M.

I remember it as it was one of rare apps built in XUL, the same framework as Mozilla apps (Firefox).

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Joost

Post reply on HN