11–20 of 34 posts
- it guarantees less competition
- I’m guaranteed to get an interview. I’m not paying to get directly a No as an answer
- it guarantees the company is actually hiring for that role
Unfortunately, I don’t see how one can enforce anything on companies unless it comes via regulations
[flagged]
> Would that be a net positive or negative for employees? In what world would this be a net positive for employees?
If it guaranteed that you got a phone screen, I imagine a lot of SWEs would take that deal.
> Would that be a net positive or negative for employees? In what world would this be a net positive for employees?
Seek au terms: 29. You may not ask or require any candidate to pay a fee, charge, cost or any money whatsoever in connection with the hiring process for any job advertised on our websites and apps (including to apply) whether such fee, charge, cost or money is asked or required of the candidate in the job advertisement itself or in any communication with the candidate that takes place as a result of a job advertisement placed on our websites and apps
It gets awkward and weird applying for multiple jobs through different recruiters that all work for the employers, and they all want you to be exclusive with them and sell their employers/jobs hard and trash talk any other options you have, and tough keeping track of all the different jobs / applications.
It seems like it would be nice to have one recruiter that manages your whole job hunt, lets you choose the best option, and gets paid no matter which job you end up choosing so they're not motivated to push you towards particular jobs.
You could have a really great candidate who for what ever reason, couldn’t afford to apply then and there, and the company would then miss out on amazing talent.
It would be a net negative for employers and prospective employees. Who would want to apply for a job at a company that charges you to submit the application? What service are applicants paying for?
Absolute nonsense.