Live data from Hacker News

Ask HN: Claude 3.5 Sonnet vs. o1 vs. for coding. Let's talk!

news.ycombinator.com

11–20 of 21 posts

Re: Ask HN: Claude 3.5 Sonnet vs. o1 vs. <other> for coding. Let's talk!

#11

I prefer o1. I mostly use it as a knowledge system. Don't really care for the automatic code generation nonsense. Unless I'm really tired and the task is very simple, in which case I might decide to write a paragraph of text instead of 30 lines of Python. My experience is that when ChatGPT fails, Claude fails too. On some advanced coding tasks, I find ChatGPT's depth of reasoning ability to be better.

Out of curiosity, could you give an example of 30 loc python code that would require a lot of text to describe? I usually find that high level descriptions with maybe one iteration with refinements work surprisingly well if the assistant has knowledge of the context.

Re: Ask HN: Claude 3.5 Sonnet vs. o1 vs. <other> for coding. Let's talk!

#13
post #10

o1: - better for when the response has to address many subgoals coherently - usually will not undo previous bugfix progress that was made earlier in the conversation, whereas with Claude if you start having extremely long conversations I have noticed it allowing certain bugs it had already fixed to be reintroduced at much later times Claude: - image inputs are actually very complementary for debugging issues, esp if…

thanks!

> with Claude if you start having extremely long conversations I have noticed it allowing certain bugs it had already fixed to be reintroduced at much later times

i think this is a result of its inability to handle long contexts well?

Re: Ask HN: Claude 3.5 Sonnet vs. o1 vs. <other> for coding. Let's talk!

#14
post #7

O1 for collabing on design docs, o1 for overall structure, break it into tasks per preference / sort; sonnet/o1 for executing each small tasks. O1 is higher quality, more nuanced, and has deeper understanding; the biggest downside rn is the significantly higher latency (both due to thinking, and also, continue.dev doesn't support o1 streaming currently, so you're waiting until it's all done), and higher cost. In term…

yes, o1 def. seems to have a deeper 'understanding'

Re: Ask HN: Claude 3.5 Sonnet vs. o1 vs. <other> for coding. Let's talk!

#16

I prefer o1. I mostly use it as a knowledge system. Don't really care for the automatic code generation nonsense. Unless I'm really tired and the task is very simple, in which case I might decide to write a paragraph of text instead of 30 lines of Python. My experience is that when ChatGPT fails, Claude fails too. On some advanced coding tasks, I find ChatGPT's depth of reasoning ability to be better.

curious what you meant by a knowledge system. thanks

Re: Ask HN: Claude 3.5 Sonnet vs. o1 vs. <other> for coding. Let's talk!

#18
post #6

o1 if you're going to write full specs and not provide any context. Sonnet 3.5 if you can provide context (e.g. with cursor) gpt-4o for UI design. Also for solving screenshots of interviews

wdym by 'screenshots of interviews'? like coding interview questions?
Post reply on HN