Live data from Hacker News

Ask HN: What would you do with a 130 ton locomotive?

news.ycombinator.com

11–20 of 49 posts

Re: Ask HN: What would you do with a 130 ton locomotive?

#12

> Locomotive engine must be disabled per a state grant funding agreement. What a dumb requirement. It's like the cash-for-clunkers program requiring the engines to be destroyed. The service life of a locomotive is effectively infinite - even after their useful freight days are done, they usually get refitted and sent to the developing world, or converted into a fixed power generator.

> What a dumb requirement.

Wonder how "disabled" it has to be?

Or maybe it could be transferred to another organization that might meet the requirements of the state?

Maybe something like roaring camp railroad, or niles canyon.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Roaring_Camp_%26_Big_Trees_Nar...

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Niles_Canyon_Railway

Re: Ask HN: What would you do with a 130 ton locomotive?

#15

I put my money on it becoming an installation at Burning Man.

I am already imagining another HeavyDSparks episode they they attempt to recover it after it gets stuck in several feet of subsurface mud out there. Half of their content is extreme Burning Man vehicle recoveries.

Re: Ask HN: What would you do with a 130 ton locomotive?

#17
Sounds like a diesel-electric locomotive, right? If only the diesel engine is irreversibly damaged, it would still make a very good electric locomotive; easiest to convert for 750 DC third rail/1.5/3kV DC overhead, but with modern power electronics all options are possible (also 25kV AC overhead power). You just need some new circuitry, either modern, IGBT transistor-based, or old-school resistive DC one, possibly re-using most of the circuitry powering it from the original diesel-moved generator. Would be nice to own one :)

You could DM me if you would some need help in "rewiring" it, I have some experience with railway rolling stock of all kinds.

Re: Ask HN: What would you do with a 130 ton locomotive?

#19
post #12

> Locomotive engine must be disabled per a state grant funding agreement. What a dumb requirement. It's like the cash-for-clunkers program requiring the engines to be destroyed. The service life of a locomotive is effectively infinite - even after their useful freight days are done, they usually get refitted and sent to the developing world, or converted into a fixed power generator.

> What a dumb requirement. Wonder how "disabled" it has to be? Or maybe it could be transferred to another organization that might meet the requirements of the state? Maybe something like roaring camp railroad, or niles canyon. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Roaring_Camp_%26_Big_Trees_Nar... https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Niles_Canyon_Railway

"Currently, sales and shipping only available in state of CA."

So they don't want it to be used in CA, but are only selling it in CA. Hence the engine must be disabled.

Re: Ask HN: What would you do with a 130 ton locomotive?

#20
These will absolutely be bought by a smaller freight rail company even if for spare parts. The requirement to disable the engine is wasteful.

Eg. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Southern_Shorthaul_Railroad still runs 75 year old diesel locomotives since the tech hasn’t changed that much. This is common in the industry. The caltrain models are positively leading edge since they are only 40years old.

Suggesting a use other than continuing as a freight car for such a young model of diesel locomotive is like putting an iPhone 16 in an ancient history museum. It’s crazy talk.

Post reply on HN