Wage fixing is when multiple companies agree to set wages at a certain amount. Sharing compensation data across companies doesn't necessarily mean wage fixing. Company A can use the compensation data from Company B to try and compete better for talent. Not saying thats what it will be used for, but it's technically not wage fixing.
Ask HN: Why is Pave legal?
11–20 of 523 posts
Re: Ask HN: Why is Pave legal?
#12Re: Ask HN: Why is Pave legal?
#13It smells awfully close to: https://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/justice-department-sues-realp...
Re: Ask HN: Why is Pave legal?
#14My guess is that they would argue that most of the data they use is public, just go on LinkedIn and look at 10 job listings to have a range.
Re: Ask HN: Why is Pave legal?
#15Re: Ask HN: Why is Pave legal?
#16It smells awfully close to: https://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/justice-department-sues-realp...
Re: Ask HN: Why is Pave legal?
#17Wage fixing is when multiple companies agree to set wages at a certain amount. Sharing compensation data across companies doesn't necessarily mean wage fixing. Company A can use the compensation data from Company B to try and compete better for talent. Not saying thats what it will be used for, but it's technically not wage fixing.
I'm asking this as someone with 0 legal knowledge: doesn't the context matter? If every company takes this data and is like "we want to pay at the 95th percentile" (which is what they all do), that seems like wage fixing even if they're not all agreeing to it together.
In fact if every company did pay at 95th percentile then I’d say it’s a good outcome. There’s a 5 percentile slack which is not too bad?
Re: Ask HN: Why is Pave legal?
#18Re: Ask HN: Why is Pave legal?
#19Wage fixing is when multiple companies agree to set wages at a certain amount. Sharing compensation data across companies doesn't necessarily mean wage fixing. Company A can use the compensation data from Company B to try and compete better for talent. Not saying thats what it will be used for, but it's technically not wage fixing.
I'm asking this as someone with 0 legal knowledge: doesn't the context matter? If every company takes this data and is like "we want to pay at the 95th percentile" (which is what they all do), that seems like wage fixing even if they're not all agreeing to it together.
Re: Ask HN: Why is Pave legal?
#20Huh, looks like they've pivoted (or is that a different Pave?). > Pave: We turn your Google Analytics data in actionable insights + reports with our data science AI algorithm. https://www.ycombinator.com/companies/pave
https://www.ycombinator.com/companies/pave-2
I'd say "if you work in a company like this you're a bad person", but sociopaths, sorry, Wharton graduates won't give a shit anyway.