Ask HN: Is Knuth's TAOCP worth the time and effort?
11–20 of 192 posts
Re: Ask HN: Is Knuth's TAOCP worth the time and effort?
#12Your milage will vary. I got zero value from the books. They do make a good doorstop though.
Thanks for being honest about it. Sad to see that it's downvoted. I guess people spent the time and effort and don't want to admit it might not have been valuable.
Re: Ask HN: Is Knuth's TAOCP worth the time and effort?
#13I thought the books where a kind of reference material, rather than a guided study.
Re: Ask HN: Is Knuth's TAOCP worth the time and effort?
#14Your milage will vary. I got zero value from the books. They do make a good doorstop though.
Thanks for being honest about it. Sad to see that it's downvoted. I guess people spent the time and effort and don't want to admit it might not have been valuable.
Generally people that continue reading through TAOCP and invest the time and effort in doing so do get value from that or are foolish to keep going.
I read the early volumes thoroughly in the 80s and 90s and got a lot of insight into, for one example, methods for constraining error when doing chained numerical calculations.
His approach alone was inspiring at the time even if specific chapters weren't of any immediate interest.
They're not especially useful for general journeyman programmers and they're but one star in the firmament for people aiming higher .. but they are worth the effort if the material is of interest.
Re: Ask HN: Is Knuth's TAOCP worth the time and effort?
#15Your milage will vary. I got zero value from the books. They do make a good doorstop though.
Thanks for being honest about it. Sad to see that it's downvoted. I guess people spent the time and effort and don't want to admit it might not have been valuable.
Re: Ask HN: Is Knuth's TAOCP worth the time and effort?
#16As a pastime, maybe. For a practitioner CLRS offers better value for time spent IMO, and is not devoid of mathematical rigor either.
Re: Ask HN: Is Knuth's TAOCP worth the time and effort?
#17> he told me the book may be trying too hard
Knuth isn't trying to write a novel or something to learn from, rather a concise, comprehensive attempt to cover the field of Computer Science. It's a repository of knowledge. He marks some exercises at 50 which, from memory, means that if you can solve it fully you are in the running for a Turing award. One of the Python core developers was once asked what the developers did in their sparetime: We read Knuth so you don't have to [0].
Re: Ask HN: Is Knuth's TAOCP worth the time and effort?
#18Your milage will vary. I got zero value from the books. They do make a good doorstop though.
Thanks for being honest about it. Sad to see that it's downvoted. I guess people spent the time and effort and don't want to admit it might not have been valuable.