Earlier quoted context omitted.
> Ultimately the point of the question is A.) To tell if you're lying about your experience You’re the one who suggested the idea, that the question is a way to tell if a candidate is lying about their experience.
Right, among other things and not “on the spot”. And I would argue that being unable to communicate about your experience is, to an interviewer, pretty similar to lying as they’re just a candidate making unverifiable claims. Many people lie about their experience. Usually it’s glaringly obvious.
my point is that assuming everyone is lying, biases you to the extent you want the outcome to be that the person is lying such that you can pat yourself on the back for a good job done rather than coming to the awkward conclusion you were wrong. and that is a real problem in interviewing because it means you discard top candidates.