Live data from Hacker News

Ask HN: Suggestions to host 10TB data with a monthly +100TB bandwidth

news.ycombinator.com

11–20 of 199 posts

Re: Ask HN: Suggestions to host 10TB data with a monthly +100TB bandwidth

#14
post #10

Cloudflare R2 has free egress, cheap storage

And they just added TCP client sockets in Workers. We are just one step step away from being able to serve literally anything on their amazing platform (listener sockets).

Does this mean you can self host ngrok?

Re: Ask HN: Suggestions to host 10TB data with a monthly +100TB bandwidth

#16
post #8

Wasabi.com is usually a good bet when your primary cost is bandwidth.

> If your monthly egress data transfer is less than or equal to your active storage volume, then your storage use case is a good fit for Wasabi’s free egress policy > If your monthly egress data transfer is greater than your active storage volume, then your storage use case is not a good fit for Wasabi’s free egress policy. https://wasabi.com/paygo-pricing-faq/

Their pricing was good enough that I just stored a spacer file with them to qualify for higher bandwidth transfer.

Re: Ask HN: Suggestions to host 10TB data with a monthly +100TB bandwidth

#17
Depends on what exactly you want to do with it. Hetzner has very cheap Storage boxes (10TB for $20/month with unlimited traffic) but those are closer to FTP boxes with a 10 connection limit. They are also down semi-regularly for maintenance.

For rock-solid public hosting Cloudflare is probably a much better bet, but you're also paying 7 times the price. More than a dedicated server to host the files, but you get more on other metrics.

Re: Ask HN: Suggestions to host 10TB data with a monthly +100TB bandwidth

#19
post #5

Cloudflare R2 has free egress, cheap storage

Cloudflare has free bandwidth up to a point and then they will charge you. That’s not really that surprising though.

I think that's the case with their free CDN/DNS/proxy offering, not R2.
Post reply on HN