Supervisees will always be somewhere on a continuum from "low experience/confidence, need lots of care and guidance" to "10x takes care of everything". As a supervisor I find that recognizing and acknowledging (directly) to the high performers that: - I'm aware of their skills, accomplishments & impact, and - I see my job as shielding them from bullshit and giving them enough slack to organize their own time & workfl…
Ask HN: Managing people smarter than you
11–20 of 22 posts
Re: Ask HN: Managing people smarter than you
#12I think the best way to think of this is not "how to I manage this person?" but rather how to I manage effectively the team with this person's contributions? Where things are working well, let them run, and where ever possible make sure everyone is aware of what's happening and keep people on the same page.
> Try harder to meet them at their level and challenge them?
I think the thing to do is make sure that what they're doing is comprehensible to you, the team, and to a wider audience. Be the 'straight guy' in the middle of a sitcom where everything happening around them gets illustrated to the audience.
> How would you all like to be managed if you were in their position?
I often am. A balance is best, sometimes stay out of the way and let creativity fly, other times make sure that other members of the team get a chance to flex their brains. Having them work together on things (e.g. pair programming) with various teammates could have good attributes rub off and other social benefits 'rub on?'.
I've also appreciated feedback to work more 'in the open' so that folks can see what leads up to these ideas/solutions. I use that to now write-up detailed descriptions in issues or code changes for review including some of the ideation history and perhaps a discarded or pre-optimized simple-case design evolution to the proposed one.
Re: Ask HN: Managing people smarter than you
#13Also, as with all your reports, you should help them grow in the direction they want (maybe they want to get more comfortable in business-facing situations? If so, let them conduct some presentations for senior mgmt types etc.).
Re: Ask HN: Managing people smarter than you
#14Re: Ask HN: Managing people smarter than you
#15Re: Ask HN: Managing people smarter than you
#16Now you’re good at selling these ideas to the rest of the company, so just do that. Make sure you give the credit to the right people, and they’ll feel rewarded.
If you want you may give people some slightly more specific title like “lead developer” or “solution architect”. Though this may annoy some other people. You may also reward the person with higher salary (disclaimer here: I am not that person).
Re: Ask HN: Managing people smarter than you
#17Re: Ask HN: Managing people smarter than you
#18Speak shortly and directly, you're aggressive and condescending, at best.
So be ready to call the bluff if someone is basically threatening to not like you -- lots of people don't like their boss... that's why it's work, that's why you get a paycheck, instead of all living in a house doing tye dye and bong hits between coding sessions.
Re: Ask HN: Managing people smarter than you
#19Re: Ask HN: Managing people smarter than you
#20The fact that you are here, asking about how to do better is already a very good sign. Congrats. You may feel like not adding much value because you may be measuring yourself by the wrong metric. If you are / was a software developer, its kinda easy to see your contribution, you just pull the git log. When you are leading, its way harder to notice. Thats the jump to the soft skills. I like to think soft skills are ca…