Ask HN: What is the best jurisdiction for internationally distributed teams?
11–20 of 208 posts
Re: Ask HN: What is the best jurisdiction for internationally distributed teams?
#12Do you need a subsidiary or some legal entity in the foreign country in order to pay employment taxes? If they're direct employees of the US entity, what's their legal status in the US? Can you avoid all these questions by using foreign contractors rather than hiring foreign employees?
Re: Ask HN: What is the best jurisdiction for internationally distributed teams?
#13Nice weather too.
Re: Ask HN: What is the best jurisdiction for internationally distributed teams?
#14With a fully remote setup like you describe, what are the mechanics of hiring a foreign team member? Do you need a subsidiary or some legal entity in the foreign country in order to pay employment taxes? If they're direct employees of the US entity, what's their legal status in the US? Can you avoid all these questions by using foreign contractors rather than hiring foreign employees?
Re: Ask HN: What is the best jurisdiction for internationally distributed teams?
#15Wherever the CEO/founder lives. You can always move the company, better to just get something formed and worry about optimizing for taxes later. Pay folks as contractors and you don't have to worry about having a presence in their country.
Re: Ask HN: What is the best jurisdiction for internationally distributed teams?
#16Estonia is also a really good choice within EU. With their digital residency card, everything can be managed online with digital signatures only.
Re: Ask HN: What is the best jurisdiction for internationally distributed teams?
#17I don't see Malta mentioned. They speak English, are in the EU, use Euros, and have low tax. Nice weather too.
Re: Ask HN: What is the best jurisdiction for internationally distributed teams?
#18Because of the US FATCA law you may have trouble opening a bank account in some countries (smaller entities simply can’t be bothered with the paperwork the US demands on accounts for “US Persons”, a term which has specific meaning). In practice this just means you have to deal with larger banks.
Note I’ve been a US resident for decades, and started several companies here, but am not a US citizen and have lived and worked on three other continents as well so had no prior bias.
* Note 2: this business is intended to be quite profitable relatively soon, rather than a “focus on user growth and toggle the profit switch later business.
Re: Ask HN: What is the best jurisdiction for internationally distributed teams?
#19Re: Ask HN: What is the best jurisdiction for internationally distributed teams?
#20Many Dutch financial institutions hate people who have the "US person" status. If you own a US-incorporated company then I believe you will gain that status. Banks, lenders, stock brokers, etc will either refuse to do business with you, or will give you a lot of paperwork headache and/or charge you more tax. I think this has to do with the fact that US persons have to comply with FACTA.
For example I have 3 stock brokerage accounts (1 for personal, 1 for pension, 1 for business). They all ask me whether I have the US person status, and 2 of them just flat out tell me that they won't do business with me if I answer yes.
Not sure whether financial institutions in other European companies also come with this caveat. But since it's related to FACTA, I believe they do.