Live data from Hacker News

Ask HN: How do defense startups work?

news.ycombinator.com

11–17 of 17 posts

Re: Ask HN: How do defense startups work?

#11
Here are the big-name defense contractors that are US-based: Lockheed Martin, Raytheon, General Dynamics, Boeing and Northrop Grumman.

Lockheed Martin, Raytheon, General Dynamics and Northrop Grumman are almost entirely (if not entirely) focused on work for the military. Boeing has lots of their own commercial stuff, but they also do work for the military. The work these companies do is pretty broad. They can make fighter jets, but also custom software.

The military tends to get funding for certain projects, and then seeks out contractors to research, build or manufacture things for them. In some cases, they may split budget between multiple companies or organizations. The military tends to select companies or organizations with demonstrated expertise in a project area.

I was on a DARPA project, and when DARPA announces projects, you have to apply to be selected. The money from our project wasn't funded by DARPA directly, but rather via the Air Force Research Labs. All of the companies or organizations that were selected for the collaborative research team I was on, were experts in some privacy-related area (usability, data storage, AI, differential privacy etc). I worked for a big-name university which was awarded a contract, and we were held accountable for how we spent the money. Keep in mind, congress keeps an eye on these budgets. We also didn't strictly do research, we were expected to produce something tangible and had to put in an honest effort to transfer the technology to the public.

So when you talk about startups and VC funding, I can't imagine there are too many (if any) of those kinds of companies around. A VC is going to invest in a company, because that company is producing a product that is going to get them a return on their investment. If the government isn't awarding contracts to your startup, then you aren't making money. Think back to SpaceX vs Blue Origin, and how much money Bezos lost on that NASA contract. One of the companies I worked with that gets awarded DARPA money was started by an ex-DAPRA project manager. They had connections. Other companies who did contracting work for the military were well-established and have a track record of delivering quality. You just won't really see college-aged kids come out with an idea for defense, get a ton of VC money and then start working with the government. Chances are more likely that they will build some product that has relevancy to the government, and thus the government becomes a sort of side-customer. College-aged kids just aren't really established enough to be taken seriously for these kinds of things. They may get to work on those projects during the course of their research at university, though.

For things like limitations on research, as mentioned above, you will be awarded a research grant for a specific project. Your limitations are scoped to that project. The military (DARPA in this case) could hypothetically decide a particle disintegrator is worth researching, and then call for people to apply if they got funding for it. You will see companies and universities applying for this work. DARPA project managers tend to be experts in a specific area. The project manager for Brandeis (the project I was on) is an expert in cryptography. So you won't see random people coming up with random ideas. The project managers have to come up with a project that is worth getting funding on, which isn't easy as I understand.

For legal stuff... one of the organizations on the DARPA project I was on ended up developing technology that the military decided to keep secret. I don't know if those individuals ended up getting a security clearance or what, but they weren't allowed to discuss the work with other team members who weren't involved. Typically a contractor will want to see US Citizens and ask that they get a security clearance, but sometimes there is work that doesn't require a clearance. As mentioned in another post, you do have to consider laws like ITAR especially if you start using HTTPS and other encryption methods. If it is a DARPA project, there shouldn't be any "legal" issues that randomly prop up. They keep in touch with you, so unless you keep things a secret from them, that shouldn't happen.

Re: Ask HN: How do defense startups work?

#12
You can look into the SBIR program from the federal government (www.sbir.gov/). Every federal agency with significant research dollars is supposed to participate in this program to help provide seed money to small businesses.

Each agency is slightly different but the gist is...

- Every year (or quarter or whatever) the agency will put out requests for grants. Some may be specific, some more vague. Examples might be the Navy wants to fund research in new glass material for underwater windows, or the department of energy wants new ways to monitor wind turbine health, etc

- grants are broken up in phases, so phase 1 may be $150k/6 months, phase 2 is $1M/12-24 months

- you write a proposal and submit it! It is evaluated by the strength of the statement of work and team.

- the idea is that ultimately you can commercialize the product! You should already have one customer :)

Re: Ask HN: How do defense startups work?

#13
In today's world, governments are more interested than ever in innovative technology that can help protect their citizens. The military, police forces, and other security agencies are all looking for ways to perform their duties more efficiently, safely, and effectively.

But many of the companies that have the knowledge and capabilities to help are small startups working in a highly competitive market. Getting noticed by a government buyer is difficult since they only purchase from large businesses; small companies need to grow into large ones before they can do business with government agencies, but government contracts are the way to make this happen.

The goal of defense startups is therefore to get acquired or go public so they can be seen as legitimate suppliers.

This means that although they may start out as nonprofits or charities at first, they eventually become commercial enterprises with stockholders and executives.

Re: Ask HN: How do defense startups work?

#14
- What distinguishes a defense startup apart from just some nerds "blowing things up in the desert"?

Security clearances

- Aside from accidents in testing, what are the common pitfalls of this field of study?

The government can be very difficult to work with and slow. They may love what you do but vetting and delays and lazy people can sink you

- Are there stories that come to mind about notable contractors that encountered problems? Notable successes?

Yes. Bits Systems and Zeta Associates.

- What legal risks are there in the development and procurement process? I'd assume just by virtue of searching certain topics or even acquiring parts you'd be having some very serious conversations with officials. Do these startups have a formal way to announce their intentions ahead of time before trouble erupts?

Everything falls under a classification regime and even unclassified stuff is usually subject to ITAR

- What is the general consensus of this field when it is not war time? Is it generally feast or famine, or is the demand for defense tech relatively constant?

Depends on what you do. The IC is always looking for better tools, and there’s huge overlap between defense and space. Can’t build missiles? Build satellites

- Are these startups typically VC funded on the open market, or does your government typically fund ideas it needs/wants?

Both. The government may give a contract where they pay as development happens. But there’s also groups like In-Q-Tel which operates as a standard VC fund focusing on defense and intelligence.

- What are the limitations of the concepts that may be researched? Surely you can't just come up with an idea for a particle disintegrator and start vaporizing cacti in the wild. Are defense contractors generally limited to missiles and things of that sort?

No. Most of defense contractors do work on software in some capacity. For weapons, you leave it to the major defense contractors.

- What are the dominant traits that contractors generally have that make them a good fit for this field?

Understanding of the legal regime they operate in. Having an existing security clearance. An appreciation for the mission.

Re: Ask HN: How do defense startups work?

#16
> What distinguishes a defense startup apart from just some nerds "blowing things up in the desert"?

Connections formed over the years of being part of the military industrial complex. Colonel or general rotates out of a job from the Pentagon to a big defense contractor, to a think tank, to a CIA gig, to a major media talking head job, back to a defense contractor, and so on.

It is almost unheard of that startups of the kind you seem to be imagining make any inroads in government procurement. It is deeply corrupt and does not resemble what you would imagine to be an open market.

Re: Ask HN: How do defense startups work?

#17

I'm not exactly in the space you are talking about, but in the USA, we have two broad categories for this stuff, ITAR and EAR. ITAR is the set of regulations that covers technology that only have one use, government (think missiles/night vision goggles/combat body armor). The EAR covers everything that can be used by both the government and consumers/enterprise (think quantum computing, AI, green tech, and cybersecur…

I’ve seen a few tirades on HN along the lines “the kids are going into FAANG and useless startups instead of working on DARPA projects”. 99% of the time when I try to learn about some program or opportunity with the federal government I get met with most most hostile website on earth which seems to be intent on not giving me any useful information.

It used to be that the government would explicitly solicit for somebody to build them a particle disintegrator. If that was your business, you could then apply for a grant based on that solicitation. Recently, they have added something called “open topic”, which is basically for anything that the government would find useful but isn’t smart enough to ask for, from ray guns to open source cybersecurity projects. I think if it’s related to either blowing things up, or preventing things from getting blown up, uncle sam wants to talk to you!
Post reply on HN