Honestly, Google can now do most of the basic things that WA could do. And the more complex things WA could do oftentimes require a bunch of trial and error to figure out the correct syntax/phrasing to use to get correct results, to the point where it was just easier to either do the calculation manually or find a dedicated site for it. So it has just lost utility for me.
Ask HN: Whatever happened to Wolfram Alpha?
11–20 of 281 posts
Re: Ask HN: Whatever happened to Wolfram Alpha?
#12Re: Ask HN: Whatever happened to Wolfram Alpha?
#13They put their "step-by-step" explanations behind a [login/pay]wall which made it significantly less useful. Out of sight, out of mind. It's still there
Good thing is, they have a montly cost, but the mobile app you just buy once and it works forever. And it's not that expensive iirc.
Re: Ask HN: Whatever happened to Wolfram Alpha?
#14I use it regularly. Sometimes it’s broken, and maybe nobody notices but me? :) Their natural language queries for things that I know they know about are amazing. Here are some that I have used recently. You really need to see these results to appreciate them. I wanted to know how tall my daughter might be. 8 year old female 55 lbs http://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=8%20year%20old%20female... I wanted to know the nu…
wow, typing "8 year old female" into a search engine might cause some trouble
Re: Ask HN: Whatever happened to Wolfram Alpha?
#15What do you mean? I used it to solve a nasty impedance network for the real and imaginary components yesterday and the solutions were accurate. Edit: Maybe it's just good enough that people treat it as a tool and see no need to market it. It consistently has worked fine-ish for years and is useful at what it does.
I guess what I should be doing is looking at the Alexa ranking of Wolfram Alpha.
Re: Ask HN: Whatever happened to Wolfram Alpha?
#16Probably an incredibly trivial use-case but still useful regularly for me...
Re: Ask HN: Whatever happened to Wolfram Alpha?
#17WA offers answers with drawings. Google cannot do that.
https://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=how+many+3mm+circles+p...
Re: Ask HN: Whatever happened to Wolfram Alpha?
#18Re: Ask HN: Whatever happened to Wolfram Alpha?
#19I use it whenever I have something mildly annoying to convert, especially dates. e.g. https://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=1636221900+unix+time+i... Probably an incredibly trivial use-case but still useful regularly for me...
Example: 4 atomic mass units * (1000 nm/sec)^2
Google Result: 6.64215616 × 10-39 joules
I use this all the time. I use wolfram alpha for solving equations or systems of equations but I use google for unit conversions because it's got better input parsing (frankly).
I should try the wolfram alpha math entry mode probably, I think that didn't exist when I started using it. If I could manually enter the equations with stricter formatting to ensure it's interpreted properly I'd use it more.
Re: Ask HN: Whatever happened to Wolfram Alpha?
#20Although for the basics of differential geometry like the Weingarten equations and the Dupin indicatrix WA is lacking - as is Wikipedia except for the articles in the german Wikipedia. And I haven't found a way to get to the 'Weingarten equations' searching for 'Weingarten', you only find him by the full name 'Julius Weingarten'. :(
https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Weingartenabbildung https://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=weingarten+equations https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Indikatrix https://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=dupin+indikatrix