Ask HN: Best Place to Live in 2050?
11–20 of 52 posts
Re: Ask HN: Best Place to Live in 2050?
#12I'd say Poland, good defense capabilities, moderate climate, great, modern infrastructure, economic resilience (vis a vis 2008 financial crisis)
Poland, as many other European countries, has terrible defense capabilities - it's basically mostly a flat plain that can be invaded without having to deal with any natural obstacles (mountains, swamps etc.). Also, there's not that many forests. Realistically, any prolonged guerilla warfare against overwhelming enemy forces (the only strategy that works in cases of big power disparity - see US vs Vietnam, US or USSR vs Afghanistan, USSR vs Finland, Germany vs Switzerland (Germans decided the attack is not worth it given how many mountains are there in Switzerland)) could be only done in the mountainous southernmost part of Poland. Other than that, we're gonna get steamrolled, like we (or France, Denmark, Netherlands, Belgium etc.) did in 1939.
Re: Ask HN: Best Place to Live in 2050?
#13I'd say Poland, good defense capabilities, moderate climate, great, modern infrastructure, economic resilience (vis a vis 2008 financial crisis)
> good defense capabilities Poland, as many other European countries, has terrible defense capabilities - it's basically mostly a flat plain that can be invaded without having to deal with any natural obstacles (mountains, swamps etc.). Also, there's not that many forests. Realistically, any prolonged guerilla warfare against overwhelming enemy forces (the only strategy that works in cases of big power disparity - se…
Re: Ask HN: Best Place to Live in 2050?
#14In a societal collapse scenario, you probably want to live in a country with decent defence ability and enough clout to throw its weight around in international diplomacy, even if quality of life is lower than some of the smaller, better located, better governed countries. Eg. Germany over Sweden.
Re: Ask HN: Best Place to Live in 2050?
#15Re: Ask HN: Best Place to Live in 2050?
#16Earlier quoted context omitted.
> good defense capabilities Poland, as many other European countries, has terrible defense capabilities - it's basically mostly a flat plain that can be invaded without having to deal with any natural obstacles (mountains, swamps etc.). Also, there's not that many forests. Realistically, any prolonged guerilla warfare against overwhelming enemy forces (the only strategy that works in cases of big power disparity - se…
I was talking about an army.
Re: Ask HN: Best Place to Live in 2050?
#17Low population density - check
Good defense - check
Cultural and societal background necessary for a post collapse - check
Carrying capacity of land - check
Energy (oil/atomic) - check
Nukes - check
Base of LOWER(more resilient to supply chain disruptions) tech industry - check
Benefits from climate change - check
Re: Ask HN: Best Place to Live in 2050?
#18Probably a scandinavian country, Sweden seems like a good bet with a decent social system and well maintained infrastructure.
Re: Ask HN: Best Place to Live in 2050?
#19Ask yourself what type of answer you’d have gotten in 1970s when the climate change fear at the time was that we’d all be freezing.