Live data from Hacker News

Ask HN: Best Place to Live in 2050?

news.ycombinator.com

11–20 of 52 posts

Re: Ask HN: Best Place to Live in 2050?

#12
post #11

I'd say Poland, good defense capabilities, moderate climate, great, modern infrastructure, economic resilience (vis a vis 2008 financial crisis)

> good defense capabilities

Poland, as many other European countries, has terrible defense capabilities - it's basically mostly a flat plain that can be invaded without having to deal with any natural obstacles (mountains, swamps etc.). Also, there's not that many forests. Realistically, any prolonged guerilla warfare against overwhelming enemy forces (the only strategy that works in cases of big power disparity - see US vs Vietnam, US or USSR vs Afghanistan, USSR vs Finland, Germany vs Switzerland (Germans decided the attack is not worth it given how many mountains are there in Switzerland)) could be only done in the mountainous southernmost part of Poland. Other than that, we're gonna get steamrolled, like we (or France, Denmark, Netherlands, Belgium etc.) did in 1939.

Re: Ask HN: Best Place to Live in 2050?

#13
post #11

I'd say Poland, good defense capabilities, moderate climate, great, modern infrastructure, economic resilience (vis a vis 2008 financial crisis)

> good defense capabilities Poland, as many other European countries, has terrible defense capabilities - it's basically mostly a flat plain that can be invaded without having to deal with any natural obstacles (mountains, swamps etc.). Also, there's not that many forests. Realistically, any prolonged guerilla warfare against overwhelming enemy forces (the only strategy that works in cases of big power disparity - se…

I was talking about an army.

Re: Ask HN: Best Place to Live in 2050?

#14
post #7

In a societal collapse scenario, you probably want to live in a country with decent defence ability and enough clout to throw its weight around in international diplomacy, even if quality of life is lower than some of the smaller, better located, better governed countries. Eg. Germany over Sweden.

Due to climate change, Germany will become Spain (and Spain will become north of Africa) by 2050. So, perhaps the north of Sweden would suit better.

Re: Ask HN: Best Place to Live in 2050?

#16
post #13

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> good defense capabilities Poland, as many other European countries, has terrible defense capabilities - it's basically mostly a flat plain that can be invaded without having to deal with any natural obstacles (mountains, swamps etc.). Also, there's not that many forests. Realistically, any prolonged guerilla warfare against overwhelming enemy forces (the only strategy that works in cases of big power disparity - se…

I was talking about an army.

The army may last a couple of weeks against an Russian invasion... I wouldn't call it "good defense capabilities". Switzerland has good defense capabilities.

Re: Ask HN: Best Place to Live in 2050?

#17
As long as we are not talking WW3, Russia is hands down best place to be, it could easily stay cohesive with a lower standard of living, has been switching to internal supply chains for a decade now, has swaths of empty land and population not foreign to a concept of living off land, but most importantly it is under populated.

Low population density - check

Good defense - check

Cultural and societal background necessary for a post collapse - check

Carrying capacity of land - check

Energy (oil/atomic) - check

Nukes - check

Base of LOWER(more resilient to supply chain disruptions) tech industry - check

Benefits from climate change - check

Post reply on HN