Live data from Hacker News

Ask HN: Is Signal still a good app to use for encrypted messaging?

news.ycombinator.com

11–20 of 34 posts

Re: Ask HN: Is Signal still a good app to use for encrypted messaging?

#13

Depends on what you need. EFF previously used to have a scorecard[1] for all the messaging applications, but they reconsidered the model of their recommendation and put together a good set of articles on the topic which ask questions to consider and provide privacy and tech context. Here's one: https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2018/03/thinking-about-what-yo... The rest are linked from here[2]. [1]: https://www.eff.org/p…

[1] Out of date for archival purposes only.

Re: Ask HN: Is Signal still a good app to use for encrypted messaging?

#15

Rather than conspiracies theories of, depends if you are a spy or not. Anyone want to explain where Signal fails for top level spying and Nation States are coming after you? And what the safer alternative is?

The biggest issue with signal is the forced reveal of your phone number. There are several good alternatives. Wickr and session come to mind.

Re: Ask HN: Is Signal still a good app to use for encrypted messaging?

#16

Rather than conspiracies theories of, depends if you are a spy or not. Anyone want to explain where Signal fails for top level spying and Nation States are coming after you? And what the safer alternative is?

The biggest issue with signal is the forced reveal of your phone number. There are several good alternatives. Wickr and session come to mind.

If your adversary is a nation state, hiding your phone number is not an option. They already know it and might compromise a device. Perhaps another service is better or the use of a burner phone is preferred.

Re: Ask HN: Is Signal still a good app to use for encrypted messaging?

#17

Rather than conspiracies theories of, depends if you are a spy or not. Anyone want to explain where Signal fails for top level spying and Nation States are coming after you? And what the safer alternative is?

The biggest issue with signal is the forced reveal of your phone number. There are several good alternatives. Wickr and session come to mind.

Easily fixed by hosting your own Signal server and recompiling its phone apps, no?

Re: Ask HN: Is Signal still a good app to use for encrypted messaging?

#18

Earlier quoted context omitted.

The biggest issue with signal is the forced reveal of your phone number. There are several good alternatives. Wickr and session come to mind.

If your adversary is a nation state, hiding your phone number is not an option. They already know it and might compromise a device. Perhaps another service is better or the use of a burner phone is preferred.

How can a nation-state adversary compromise a device only knowing the phone number?

Re: Ask HN: Is Signal still a good app to use for encrypted messaging?

#19
post #13

Depends on what you need. EFF previously used to have a scorecard[1] for all the messaging applications, but they reconsidered the model of their recommendation and put together a good set of articles on the topic which ask questions to consider and provide privacy and tech context. Here's one: https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2018/03/thinking-about-what-yo... The rest are linked from here[2]. [1]: https://www.eff.org/p…

[1] Out of date for archival purposes only.

Quoting my own message:

> EFF previously used to have a scorecard[1] for all the messaging applications, but they reconsidered the model of their recommendation

Re: Ask HN: Is Signal still a good app to use for encrypted messaging?

#20

Earlier quoted context omitted.

If your adversary is a nation state, hiding your phone number is not an option. They already know it and might compromise a device. Perhaps another service is better or the use of a burner phone is preferred.

How can a nation-state adversary compromise a device only knowing the phone number?

1. Track locations of phones in contact.

2. Rubber hose.

3. Obtain copies of your messages still retained in your contacts' phones.

Post reply on HN