Live data from Hacker News

Ask HN: What scientific phenomenon do you wish someone would explain better?

news.ycombinator.com

11–20 of 839 posts

Re: Ask HN: What scientific phenomenon do you wish someone would explain better?

#12

Quantum Mechanics, and why we need interpretations of it.

Like.... why are sub-atomic phenomena important in general?

To add to all this, the double-slit experiment. What exactly does it mean that light moves as a wave or a particle?

Re: Ask HN: What scientific phenomenon do you wish someone would explain better?

#14
post #5

How can metric expansion of space redshift light? Doesn't that violate conservation of momentum, since the redder light has lower momentum? And adding on to that: Will light inside a box redshift? If I weigh the box (i.e. weigh the light inside the box), then wait a bit for the light to redshift, then weigh the box again?

You are correct! Cosmological redshift does violate conservation of momentum (and energy as well [1]). But conservation of energy and momentum does not actually apply if spacetime itself is globally changing.

The underlying reason for this is that Noether's theorem tells us that every physical symmetry implies a conservation law for some physical quantity. Conservation of energy and momentum comes from the fact that the physical laws are the same throughout time and space. However, cosmological expansion violates that assumption, so there is no reason that energy and momentum should still be conserved. [2]

[1]: One side note here is that relativistically, energy and momentum are not really separate physical quantities, but instead two components of the same underlying physical quantity. Unfortuantely, this quantity does not really have a good name (despite Taylor & Wheeler's attempt to call it "momenergy"). It ends up being called the momentum 4-vector, but the temporal component of this 4-vector is energy.

[2]: This is only true globally. Locally, the laws are approximately the same from one moment to the next, so conservation of energy and momentum hold for small distances and short times.

Re: Ask HN: What scientific phenomenon do you wish someone would explain better?

#15
post #10

Another frustrating one - what is heredity? If it's possible to inherit something due to a shift in behavior (i.e. it's a cultural change that leads to a biochemical change), how does that connect neatly to mendalian inheritance?

Are you talking epigenetics? It's relatively closely related to mendelian inheritance. At a high level view, if genes are present in your genome that aren't "on" in a previous generation, but due to changes in behavior become more active, then in a future generation that gene could be expressed more. It's not that the genes have changed their code, they are just flipped on or off.

No, more things that are modifications without any genetic basis - like myopia. Doesn't seem to have any genetic/epigenetic basis. It's purely a physical use case, where the eye matures improperly if it's only exposed to near-field work.

Re: Ask HN: What scientific phenomenon do you wish someone would explain better?

#17

Orbital mechanics

Have you heard of / played the game Kerbal Space Program?

I believe even folks at NASA have even said it helped cement their mathematical knowledge with a better intuitive understanding.

Re: Ask HN: What scientific phenomenon do you wish someone would explain better?

#18

Quantum Mechanics, and why we need interpretations of it.

I have tried to grok it multiple times but escapes my feeble mind. I have developed some intuition, but not sure it's quite right. Hopefully someone can correct me:

1. Subatomic Matter is by default both mass and a wave, but when "observed" it becomes a particle as we know it i.e. with mass.

2. Atomic bonds are formed due to electrons (waves) being shared between adjacent atoms.

Hope I have some parts correct. Perhaps someone can shed some photons.

Post reply on HN