Ask HN: What are less-known best practices for email deliverability?
11–16 of 16 posts
Re: Ask HN: What are less-known best practices for email deliverability?
#12Re: Ask HN: What are less-known best practices for email deliverability?
#13How would you know if they've opened it? For example, I never allow the display of pictures (external ones, not included in the email itself via data URIs) in my email client, nor anything else that might result in a ping to a server. That's the default behavior of most email clients, isn't it?
Re: Ask HN: What are less-known best practices for email deliverability?
#14> Excluding unengaged subscribers who have not opened an email from us in the last XXX days How would you know if they've opened it? For example, I never allow the display of pictures (external ones, not included in the email itself via data URIs) in my email client, nor anything else that might result in a ping to a server. That's the default behavior of most email clients, isn't it?
Re: Ask HN: What are less-known best practices for email deliverability?
#15> Excluding unengaged subscribers who have not opened an email from us in the last XXX days How would you know if they've opened it? For example, I never allow the display of pictures (external ones, not included in the email itself via data URIs) in my email client, nor anything else that might result in a ping to a server. That's the default behavior of most email clients, isn't it?
I find that this is an elegant solution that solves the problem completely; if a user finds your emails valuable enough, they wouldn't hesitate to click a link once every few months to reconfirm their subscription.
Re: Ask HN: What are less-known best practices for email deliverability?
#16When testing, something we noticed was that the content of our emails/newsletters had a significant impact on whether they ended up in the inbox vs. spam.
Of the major service providers, Outlook seems to put huge importance on the content of the email. The simple addition or deletion of a couple of words can dramatically affect spam rates.
Yahoo is less trigger-happy about content; and Gmail least of all. However, even for domains with a good sender reputation, Gmail will spam emails if the content is too 'spammy'.
Shameless plug here: we ended up building a tool to test out various email subjects/bodies against the big 3 providers above (you can even plug in your own email address/service when testing). Do try it out - I'm sure you'll find the results eye-opening: https://vetter.monsoonyeti.com/