Ask HN: Should your employer pay for your primary health care?
11–20 of 21 posts
Re: Ask HN: Should your employer pay for your primary health care?
#12Assuming the US, typically employers pay 50% or more of the cost. But the total cost isn't that much different than what you'd pay on the open market. So you just have to find out how much that benefit (and others) are worth to you when comparing salaries. Health care is currently very expensive, and IMHO, not that great. But it doesn't make that much difference who provides it. You can buy it on your own, which is especially important for the self-employed.
It's no more unethical if the company lied and said you'd get health care and then didn't do it, than if you took a job with a certain salary and benefits and then demanded more benefits that weren't part of the deal.
Re: Ask HN: Should your employer pay for your primary health care?
#13I'd answer the first one, "should you employer...", as "no". The rationale is that health care ideally should come equal to everybody, including those who don't have employer or whose employer doesn't pay for any reason. That likely means that the government should be (more) involved.
Re: Ask HN: Should your employer pay for your primary health care?
#14They always find ways out of it I've gone nearly 18 years now without any access to healthcare is it ethical to be forced to fix a broken elbow with duct tape in the richest country in the world? I had to, even after Obamacare I still had 0 access and then was taxed to punish me for lack of access the government should provide access they take the majority of my income but where does it go certainly not for my health…
Re: Ask HN: Should your employer pay for your primary health care?
#15Before World War II people bought their own health insurance. When the US government imposed salary freezes during the war, employers offered benefits such as health insurance to entice potential employees. Those benefits were also tax-free. When the war ended the system stayed in place. IOW we once had no employer-paid health insurance and we could shift back to such a system. All the same, I would expect a pay rais…
Re: Ask HN: Should your employer pay for your primary health care?
#16Re: Ask HN: Should your employer pay for your primary health care?
#17Re: Ask HN: Should your employer pay for your primary health care?
#18Before World War II people bought their own health insurance. When the US government imposed salary freezes during the war, employers offered benefits such as health insurance to entice potential employees. Those benefits were also tax-free. When the war ended the system stayed in place. IOW we once had no employer-paid health insurance and we could shift back to such a system. All the same, I would expect a pay rais…
Something is very wrong in a society when a worker depends on retaining his employment relationship with his current employer to have access to healthcare. Your employer should not have such power over the health of you and your family, and conversely the power to cut off your and your family's access to healthcare.
Re: Ask HN: Should your employer pay for your primary health care?
#19Earlier quoted context omitted.
Something is very wrong in a society when a worker depends on retaining his employment relationship with his current employer to have access to healthcare. Your employer should not have such power over the health of you and your family, and conversely the power to cut off your and your family's access to healthcare.
It’s great for the employers, and all they have to do is astroturf their employees that it’s somehow good for them and they’re getting a great deal and any alternative is worse.
Re: Ask HN: Should your employer pay for your primary health care?
#20I think that's a big risk for employer that is not itself very large (ie I suspect "no" for micro SMEs), but luckily I live in the UK so the NHS has covered me when I've needed treatment. I suspect that I probably could not have created a series of startups in the US...