(Same for perforce)
Ask HN: Who is still using Oracle?
11–15 of 15 posts
Re: Ask HN: Who is still using Oracle?
#12Earlier quoted context omitted.
I interviewed for a company which made auditing software for government departments. I asked why they chose Oracle and they explained that governments get a hefty discount, so it was actually more cost-effective than the alternatives (e.g. enterprise SQL Server). So the motivation can actually be the opposite!
Even at half-price, the cost is still out-of-this-world.
Re: Ask HN: Who is still using Oracle?
#13Re: Ask HN: Who is still using Oracle?
#14Many enterprise companies have multi-million lines of plsql and thousands of db tables. I've migrated some systems away from Oracle to "save money" but it costs a lot to move an entire business to a new platform while they are running in production.
Re: Ask HN: Who is still using Oracle?
#15Oracle was very clever offering free development licenses to software developers years ago.
This made them the db of choice for people buying a premade solution.
Nowadays it is different because we have a lot of open source DBs available to test for free; but long running monolythical apps won't change easily.