Although these days you have Airtable [2] and Ninox [3] they are having different user base than good old FoxPro.
Ask HN: Which abandoned proprietary software would you resurrect?
11–20 of 837 posts
Re: Ask HN: Which abandoned proprietary software would you resurrect?
#12Re: Ask HN: Which abandoned proprietary software would you resurrect?
#13Re: Ask HN: Which abandoned proprietary software would you resurrect?
#14Ecco is still being used 20 years later and has been binary patched to support Lua extensions. Written by a four person team in Seattle.
doogiePIM has been resuscitated by its founder, hopefully it will carry a torch for some of the ideas in Ecco and Agenda, https://bitespire.com/details_doogiepim.php
Re: Ask HN: Which abandoned proprietary software would you resurrect?
#15But that theme builder was absolutely amazing. Literally just drag and drop design for the entire theme, not just pages or whatever. Plus control over the loop and just some awesome stuff that really let you build very very cool sites really really quickly.
Elementor Pro now does some of what Headway was doing and I think Beaver Builder is moving that way, but they aren't really anywhere close to as good. Headway had graphical theme design absolutely nailed.
It's a big shame it went under and I wish it came back.
Re: Ask HN: Which abandoned proprietary software would you resurrect?
#16Re: Ask HN: Which abandoned proprietary software would you resurrect?
#17Re: Ask HN: Which abandoned proprietary software would you resurrect?
#18Re: Ask HN: Which abandoned proprietary software would you resurrect?
#19Windows 7
Re: Ask HN: Which abandoned proprietary software would you resurrect?
#20It wouldve been perfect if they'd just added an API so that users can create and share ways to get the data from various banks.
And a refactor was necessary to a native library (or even electron)
But this cloud native follow-up version is just not an option.