Were using Zulip. Before that we used Mattermost but we migrated to Zulip because of its (in our opinion) superior conversation threading model and never looked back. Mattermost, Slack, etc. all work fine when you work on a project basis but when you work on a lot of short lived operational issues (for example "Issue with invoice XYZ" Slacks conversational threading model breaks down quite fast. At least it did for u…
Ask HN: Which self-hosted, enterprise-ready Slack alternative do you use?
11–15 of 15 posts
We used mattermost in the past... maybe it's different now, but I remember the UI being frustratingly odd. Definitely didn't have the pleasant usability of slack.
Re: Ask HN: Which self-hosted, enterprise-ready Slack alternative do you use?
#12Mattermost, works quite good. It is also pretty simple to set up and deploy. [0]: https://github.com/mattermost/mattermost-server EDIT: just read your post entireley. >> 'My company does not want to use yet another free Slack alternative on GitHub' So that one is not what you are looking for. But I keep the post in case anyone is interested in it...
Mattermost does have a paid (still self-hosted) version that includes support.
Re: Ask HN: Which self-hosted, enterprise-ready Slack alternative do you use?
#13"End-to-end-encryption"
has flailed us.
Re: Ask HN: Which self-hosted, enterprise-ready Slack alternative do you use?
#14Along the same lines as the question, does anyone consider keybase.io teams feature a viable alternative for small to medium sized teams?
Re: Ask HN: Which self-hosted, enterprise-ready Slack alternative do you use?
#15Along the same lines as the question, does anyone consider keybase.io teams feature a viable alternative for small to medium sized teams?
We currently do use Keybase teams. We love the concept. Unfortunately, we do not consider Keybase production-ready, yet.
Especially the mobile apps are pretty buggy atm, which is one consideration why we’re looking for an alternative.