Earlier quoted context omitted.
To play Devil's Advocate, Mark Zuckerberg has at least had a more direct contribution to the business that made him wealthy than has Trump, who merely licenses his name to products and properties he otherwise has no involvement in. If I had to vote for a businessman, I would rather vote for the one who actually made something innovative. And Zuckerberg speaks Chinese, and even if he isn't fluent and would probably ne…
My point was, that you'd be going from a train-wreck to a pile up on the interstate. They're both fucking ridiculous concepts as the leader of a country. That you've got one of them now should be eye opening enough that this doesn't happen again for a fucking long time.
That's not what's likely to happen, though. Trump may be a garbage fire, but he still won, and the "politically competent" candidate still lost. Plenty of Americans still believe almost religiously in the concept of a "CEO in Chief," and they won't be giving that up any time soon, even if they disavow Trump as an exemplar.
Both parties are probably going to field primarily business-oriented candidates as long as it seems the electorate wants anti-establishment, anti-political leadership, at best they'll try to make sure the next one isn't as much of a buffoon.