Live data from Hacker News

Ask HN: Review my web app - Modern Ballots

modernballots.com

11–13 of 13 posts

Re: Ask HN: Review my web app - Modern Ballots

#11
post #7

I've been wishing the US had a score based voting system for a while now, but there are considerable obstacles: -Two dominant, incumbent parties that have no incentive to make it easier for more parties. -A populace that is unlikely to understand why one would even want to change the voting system, and why score-based voting would enable more parties to rise. -Millions of dollars or more invested in the current votin…

Not to rain on your parade here, but a multi-party system isn't paradise either. I'm not saying the duopoly is better, but multi-party systems are plagued with immobility, compromise for the sake of compromise, and lack of differentiation. Any European cynic will repeat that for you.

Re: Ask HN: Review my web app - Modern Ballots

#12
post #7

I've been wishing the US had a score based voting system for a while now, but there are considerable obstacles: -Two dominant, incumbent parties that have no incentive to make it easier for more parties. -A populace that is unlikely to understand why one would even want to change the voting system, and why score-based voting would enable more parties to rise. -Millions of dollars or more invested in the current votin…

Not to rain on your parade here, but a multi-party system isn't paradise either. I'm not saying the duopoly is better, but multi-party systems are plagued with immobility, compromise for the sake of compromise, and lack of differentiation. Any European cynic will repeat that for you.

Similar things could be said when moving from despotism to a democracy. No system's perfect, but some are demonstratively better than others.

Re: Ask HN: Review my web app - Modern Ballots

#13
post #7

I've been wishing the US had a score based voting system for a while now, but there are considerable obstacles: -Two dominant, incumbent parties that have no incentive to make it easier for more parties. -A populace that is unlikely to understand why one would even want to change the voting system, and why score-based voting would enable more parties to rise. -Millions of dollars or more invested in the current votin…

Not to rain on your parade here, but a multi-party system isn't paradise either. I'm not saying the duopoly is better, but multi-party systems are plagued with immobility, compromise for the sake of compromise, and lack of differentiation. Any European cynic will repeat that for you.

I didn't say that I wanted a 3+ party system, the biggest advantage would be that you wouldn't get a situation where voting for your favorite candidate screws over your close second favorite but much more likely to win candidate, as happened with Gore in 2000 when a percentage of his would-be supporters voted for Nader instead.
Post reply on HN