Ask HN: Are any of you salaried under pay-for-performance?
1–10 of 14 posts
Re: Ask HN: Are any of you salaried under pay-for-performance?
#2Re: Ask HN: Are any of you salaried under pay-for-performance?
#3Re: Ask HN: Are any of you salaried under pay-for-performance?
#4Re: Ask HN: Are any of you salaried under pay-for-performance?
#5Re: Ask HN: Are any of you salaried under pay-for-performance?
#6What about benefits? My current employer values benefits at 22% of one's gross salary. I'm a contractor so they figure if I am going to be an employee that I should work for X - 22% + a non-guaranteed performance bonus of 7-15%.
Re: Ask HN: Are any of you salaried under pay-for-performance?
#7I'm not sure why anyone would take such a deal, it's not uncommon for developers to have bonuses tied to performance but I would expect that to be on-top of a competitive base salary and not in-lieu of it.
In context of CTO-level work, pay-for-performance would also seem to encourage meeting reward goals at the expense of a thousand other unmeasured tasks.
Re: Ask HN: Are any of you salaried under pay-for-performance?
#8I've never heard of that and unless you are happy with the worst-case base salary I would renegotiate. Having been a part of many bonus systems, I never plan on the bonus money to actually hit my bank account.
Re: Ask HN: Are any of you salaried under pay-for-performance?
#9Re: Ask HN: Are any of you salaried under pay-for-performance?
#10I'm not sure why anyone would take such a deal, it's not uncommon for developers to have bonuses tied to performance but I would expect that to be on-top of a competitive base salary and not in-lieu of it.
That's exactly what I was thinking as well. In context of CTO-level work, pay-for-performance would also seem to encourage meeting reward goals at the expense of a thousand other unmeasured tasks.