Ask HN: Is this Generative AI hype healthy?
1–10 of 21 posts
Re: Ask HN: Is this Generative AI hype healthy?
#2https://web.archive.org/web/20180703132951/https://automated...
Not to mention that bots have been flooding inboxes, message boards, chat rooms, and communities for about as long as anyone can remember
I am also tired of the fakeness, but I think that with enough exposure, the hype will die down and we'll start noticing more patterns that tip us off as to whether or not something is real (at least in areas where it matters)
Re: Ask HN: Is this Generative AI hype healthy?
#3>> But for a few thousand people, the mental health support they received wasn’t entirely human. Instead, it was augmented by robots. >> “People who saw the co-written GTP-3 responses rated them significantly higher than the ones that were written purely by a human. That was a fascinating observation,” he said.
Re: Ask HN: Is this Generative AI hype healthy?
#4Re: Ask HN: Is this Generative AI hype healthy?
#5Re: Ask HN: Is this Generative AI hype healthy?
#6That's just going to be the new normal. It means there will be more services that rely on reputation and trust, e.g. verified accounts and credentials. This isn't great news for HN. Unless there are some big changes, I think HN is going to drown in generated content that's indistinguishable from low to medium quality human-written content.
Re: Ask HN: Is this Generative AI hype healthy?
#7It's one of the best times in recent memory to read Guy DeBord - like a topographic map for a landscape of modern social superstructure.
Re: Ask HN: Is this Generative AI hype healthy?
#8It's one of the best times in recent memory to read Guy DeBord - like a topographic map for a landscape of modern social superstructure.
Can you elaborate
Take Society of the Spectacle for example. It's a guidebook for those looking to understand the modern media landscape. 56 years on, reading it will take the reader on a journey that vacillates between quaint and prescient. It's written in largely an aphoristic prose that I've found to be fun reading with a partner, using each pithy paragraph as a jumping off point in to discuss its modern implications.
It would be fun and worthwhile exercise to use it as a basis for discussion in the modern generative AI landscape. With the right group, I can see it fomenting great conversations that contextualize what we're collectively experiencing as generative AI content permeates our lives.
Re: Ask HN: Is this Generative AI hype healthy?
#9This artificially ages everyone so now younger and younger people have to learn to cross reference research papers, manage tribal alliances, make bayesian inferences, deal with existential depression, navigate social hierarchies, etc...
Generative AI furthers this trend. Now individuals cannot simply BE in a reality but have to be responsible for constantly managing and curating their own realities while having a rough idea of how others are managing their own realities to work together, have relationships, etc...
I feel this is the root cause of people feeling overwhelmed. It's the responsibility of being constantly alert and ready to enforce boundaries. Like a soldier at war, fighting for the peace of a stable shared reality.
Re: Ask HN: Is this Generative AI hype healthy?
#10If so, that's not an apocalypse or the end of global communication or SaaS's or computers -- it would be an adjustment from the last 30 years of forums, blogs, social networks, influencers, and other internet folk content, where we felt like we were connecting with real people all across the world.
But based on how these latter phenomena seem to have affected mental health and physical activity, that might be a good thing. It could be that the Social Media Age was an unsustainable cultural flash and that a different kind of lifestyle experience and internet culture will come up behind.