Recognizing the inappropriateness of generally asking someone to turn on their camera during a small group discussion or client meeting in which they are contributing, I'm wondering if signing up for a fully remote role silently stipulates that you'll make a reasonable attempt to be "visible", and turn your camera on?
Ask HN: If you're in a 100% remote role, should you turn your camera on?
1–10 of 38 posts
Re: Ask HN: If you're in a 100% remote role, should you turn your camera on?
#2Re: Ask HN: If you're in a 100% remote role, should you turn your camera on?
#3Edit: I guess I should add though, I have never encountered a problem with the former situation, ie never been in a small discussion where anything is weird or we miss something because someone's camera is off. I have been in the latter situation, where people were told they have to sit and watch hours of administrative or "vision" type presentations and keep their camera on.
Re: Ask HN: If you're in a 100% remote role, should you turn your camera on?
#4Should you turn your camera on?
It’s up to you. Generally I think people like to see that each other’s expressions.
Should you stipulate someone else turn their camera on?
Etiquette not withstanding, only if you made it a requirement in the job description.
Re: Ask HN: If you're in a 100% remote role, should you turn your camera on?
#5And I don't have to because I don't work with clients or take roles in which me being on camera for more than 5 minutes during the entire duration of the role is a requirement.
Between voice and screen sharing, we can handle all business without monitoring each other's 2-dimensional faces.
Re: Ask HN: If you're in a 100% remote role, should you turn your camera on?
#6Re: Ask HN: If you're in a 100% remote role, should you turn your camera on?
#7But there are times when it's helpful, and I think it's appropriate for more structured meetings. I think a blanket policy either way would be a mistake.