Live data from Hacker News

Ask HN: Why did Coinhive, the in-browser crypto miner, fail?

news.ycombinator.com

1–10 of 52 posts

Re: Ask HN: Why did Coinhive, the in-browser crypto miner, fail?

#5
This is a particularly bad experience for mobile users with battery and CPU cooling limitations to computing.

While the growth of mobile probably wasn't a primary reason, I suspect the founders may have seen that the future didn't look great, even if they could solve the monetization of exploits and collapse of crypto prices overall headwinds. With crypto pricing falling to near the power input costs when mined on ASICs and GPUs, CPU mining from Javascript was going to be a case where users paid $1 for ~$0.10 of crypto which only a tiny sliver of the original input ($1) went to the content creator.

Re: Ask HN: Why did Coinhive, the in-browser crypto miner, fail?

#7
Speculating here, but a browser JS engine is not the ideal mining vehicle, particularly on mobile. I think you would have to have enormous volume to actually make any money. A significant amount of that would then go to the site owner (why else would they use it?), leaving very little profit for CoinHive itself.

Re: Ask HN: Why did Coinhive, the in-browser crypto miner, fail?

#8
post #4

The performance disparity between browser-based javascript and specialized mining hardware is so large, that you will be hard-pressed to generate enough revenue to support a website.

I remember reading a research paper estimating that coinhive made over $250,000 every month. What do you think about this?

Re: Ask HN: Why did Coinhive, the in-browser crypto miner, fail?

#9
A million CPUs would not be as efficient mining Bitcoin as a single ASIC. There are no coins where CPU mining is as good as GPU. JavaScript is also inefficient compared to native programs.

Overall, it probably didn't generate very much money. Mining is a commodity. An ad click is worth orders of magnitude more.

Post reply on HN