Ask HN: Why aren't you using a public cloud?
1–10 of 73 posts
Re: Ask HN: Why aren't you using a public cloud?
#2It's been 2 years of grind and umpteen number of powerpoint but I see a sea change and hopefully soon....
Re: Ask HN: Why aren't you using a public cloud?
#3Also, don't particularly trust the likes of Amazon, Google or Microsoft, and don't want to give them any more power.
Re: Ask HN: Why aren't you using a public cloud?
#4Re: Ask HN: Why aren't you using a public cloud?
#5Re: Ask HN: Why aren't you using a public cloud?
#6Financial services industry.
Re: Ask HN: Why aren't you using a public cloud?
#7For venture-backed startups with an emphasis on growth or large scale enterprises, the convenience of the cloud may outweigh the cost premium. But for small to medium size organizations where server load doesn't fluctuate on a day-to-day basis, I haven't yet been convinced that the cloud offers a good enough value proposition.
Re: Ask HN: Why aren't you using a public cloud?
#8Re: Ask HN: Why aren't you using a public cloud?
#9- Not cost-efficient at large scale. When you expect and plan to run thousands of nodes at near 100% CPU and memory usage for years at a time, running a machine room can still be less expensive.
- Specialized hardware not available in public clouds, e.g., very low latency networks configured in an optimal topology.
- Lack of control over hardware upgrade schedule. E.g., a cloud probably won’t give you those shiny new GPUs as early as you can shove them in your own servers.
The balance is shifting in many of these areas, and there’s plenty of scientific computing that can use a public cloud now. But I still wouldn’t use it for problems that are both highly CPU-intensive and require low latency networks, especially if I have long-term workloads.
Re: Ask HN: Why aren't you using a public cloud?
#10Cloud is best for handling spike workloads, not day to day.