Show HN: DeepSeek-V4 Latent Reasoning – moving "thinking" into latent space
1–10 of 30 posts
Re: Show HN: DeepSeek-V4 Latent Reasoning – moving "thinking" into latent space
#2[flagged]
Re: Show HN: DeepSeek-V4 Latent Reasoning – moving "thinking" into latent space
#3[flagged]
Re: Show HN: DeepSeek-V4 Latent Reasoning – moving "thinking" into latent space
#4Cool idea. I didn't understand what causes the bad response on the first query. Does it mean the first response in every new conversation, or just the first served response after startup?
Re: Show HN: DeepSeek-V4 Latent Reasoning – moving "thinking" into latent space
#5Am I missing something or the evals do not compare it to the baseline deepseek-v4-flash? Without a baseline comparison, it is hard to tell what works well and what doesn't
Re: Show HN: DeepSeek-V4 Latent Reasoning – moving "thinking" into latent space
#6[flagged]
As is this whole blog post... Very grating prose
Re: Show HN: DeepSeek-V4 Latent Reasoning – moving "thinking" into latent space
#7The content is unreadable. No comparison to the underlying model. Massive text expansion. Hard to tell if the numbers are real or entirely hallucinated SEO slop.
Re: Show HN: DeepSeek-V4 Latent Reasoning – moving "thinking" into latent space
#8[flagged]
The article is AI-written as well, with all the "honest problems" and "real weak spots". The code must be AI-generated too, so without a human properly verifying it, I can't take the project seriously. It may just be AI hallucinations congratulating themselves on imaginary achievements.
Re: Show HN: DeepSeek-V4 Latent Reasoning – moving "thinking" into latent space
#9[flagged]
Re: Show HN: DeepSeek-V4 Latent Reasoning – moving "thinking" into latent space
#10[flagged]