561–562 of 562 posts
Earlier quoted context omitted.
LLM‘s have been useful for ~12 months for the past 3 years. I’m not buying this any more: https://hn.algolia.com/?dateEnd=1753056000&dateRange=custom&...
They released air tools but you’d rather use a hammer to drive nails. It reflects more on /you/ than on the technology.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
If you know anything about investing, you know it is highly likely to be either A a grift or B an innocent, but naive attempt.
From the website: "Quant Competitions Achievement In 2024, I achieved 7th place at Quantiacs, a global quantitative trading competition. With a background in financial software, I built AIvestor to democratize AI-powered investing tools that were previously only available to institutions." I have no idea of the legitimacy of Quantiacs, but for someone with these claims what they are selling is extremely unfaithful. A…
Quantiacs is absolutely a legit competition. If you are interested in quant trading it's impossible not to have heard about it. Here I can see that you have absolutely no clue about this field, which is fine, but don't act as if you're a market guru which "knows about current markets".
I don't know what knowledge you have about the current markets, these stocks shown on the landing page are picked by the agent. The SaaS I built is built on the OSS chatbot I created. I host it on a machine I pay for, I change the models frequently and you get support for any technical issues. People can still use the OSS agent, but they need to host it themselves, use their own API keys, do changes themselves etc.
I have no problem selling something that works for me and that I worked hard to bring up and I don't care what a random on the internet has to say, but do not spread misinformation about something that you have no idea on how it works.