Live data from Hacker News

Influencers face backlash over Meta 'pervert glasses' content

theguardian.com

41–50 of 54 posts

Re: Influencers face backlash over Meta 'pervert glasses' content

#41
post #39
post #12

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Meanwhile, Tesla drivers are driving around with a dozen cameras mounted on their vehicle pointing in every direction. Who would have thought that would be socially acceptable in 2026.

Dash cams have been a thing for decades

and they are banned in Austria and prepare to pay hefty fine if police notice them

https://www.oeamtc.at/thema/vorschriften-strafen/zulaessigke...

Re: Influencers face backlash over Meta 'pervert glasses' content

#42
post #7

I think a small speaker should announce, in the local language, "recording in progress" when these are used.

Apparently they already have a blinking white light to indicate that recording is in progress. https://about.fb.com/news/2026/07/metas-ai-glasses-your-ques...

right, like that ever stopped anyone... all you need is a drill

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EaJSPeJmqis

Re: Influencers face backlash over Meta 'pervert glasses' content

#43
post #27

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Metas job is to maximize those 1% because that’s where the business value is. Like every other product they’ve done. 17 strikes policy for grooming for the win.

The 1% in this case would be those with vision impairment.

Lol

Re: Influencers face backlash over Meta 'pervert glasses' content

#44
post #42

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Apparently they already have a blinking white light to indicate that recording is in progress. https://about.fb.com/news/2026/07/metas-ai-glasses-your-ques...

right, like that ever stopped anyone... all you need is a drill https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EaJSPeJmqis

On that same page:

> we’re updating the glasses to disable the camera if they detect the LED was physically tampered with or destroyed

Re: Influencers face backlash over Meta 'pervert glasses' content

#45
post #9

Either Mark Zuckerberg is playing an elaborate practical joke on everyone, or this is further proof that the West Coast tech scene has become such a bubble people have lost all sense of how ordinary people think. There is just no way this was going to fly in 2026 given high and increasing negative sentiment globally towards tech, and I'm not sure what made them think otherwise

In the US, Meta sold 7 million glasses units last year and is projected to sell 25+ million next year. Waymos already record everything happening in most of the area of many cities, and use much more than just cameras. 6g standard has sensing built in. Perhaps it is not the West Coast that is in the bubble.

As other people said, the difference is dashcams and Waymos need the cameras for practical purposes, as do Ring doorbells etc, so while the privacy implications aren't great people will continue to do that stuff.

Wearing a camera on your face during normal social interactions is a deeply weird thing to do, it's not the same thing at all

Re: Influencers face backlash over Meta 'pervert glasses' content

#46
post #24

I wonder if something like the EURion constellation could be worn to disable recording by unwanted parties.

I wonder if Zuck and the C-levels have some sort of beacon that will disable these perv glasses around them (except perhaps a whitelist of users).

If I were a billionaire zunt, I'd do that...

Re: Influencers face backlash over Meta 'pervert glasses' content

#47

I'd love to have glasses that are interface for AI. Mics pointed down towards mouth from the bottom of the front glasses rim. Speakers near the ears. Cameras optional. Display optional, possibly as a simple projector that reflect the image from the concave glass surface of prescription glasses. Long term power and communication through thin cable to battery pack in a holster somewhere on the body to make the frames l…

I'd hate to talk to you or be looked at by you.

I'm not talking to people and barely looking at them so I don't really care.

Re: Influencers face backlash over Meta 'pervert glasses' content

#48
post #42

Earlier quoted context omitted.

right, like that ever stopped anyone... all you need is a drill https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EaJSPeJmqis

On that same page: > we’re updating the glasses to disable the camera if they detect the LED was physically tampered with or destroyed

I'd be really interested to know how they wanna achieve this. I can think of another camera monitoring infrared LED light, but then you can destroy the other camera again, thinking they can avoid disabling/covering the LED is extremely naive, software way maybe, hardware way impossible to avoid.

Re: Influencers face backlash over Meta 'pervert glasses' content

#49
post #40
post #7

I think a small speaker should announce, in the local language, "recording in progress" when these are used.

The shutter sound on cameras (including those built in to a phone) can't be muted in Japan

of course they can, all you need is unlock bootloader or maybe not even that, just use alternative camera app which allows this or change region or zillion other ways

it's like thinking if we start reading people's whatsapp messages we will find out pedophiles and they won't just move to app which ignores gov requirements

Re: Influencers face backlash over Meta 'pervert glasses' content

#50
post #41
post #39

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Dash cams have been a thing for decades

and they are banned in Austria and prepare to pay hefty fine if police notice them https://www.oeamtc.at/thema/vorschriften-strafen/zulaessigke...

That article doesn't say they are blanket banned in general.

Indiscriminate, permanent saving of recordings and distributing the footage is banned.

Using the dashcam to document incidents or accidents with saving a limited time span of video triggered by a sensor/timer is allowed.

Post reply on HN