Live data from Hacker News

Letter to Governor Abbott on responsible AI infrastructure in Texas

openai.com

31–40 of 245 posts

Re: Letter to Governor Abbott on responsible AI infrastructure in Texas

#31
post #15
post #11

If Virginia or Louisiana should profit by this then so be it. Californian land-use laws will have a net effect of -8 house seats against Texas. That is good. It should happen. If Texans will be poorer so Virginians will be richer, that is also good. May the American federal system reign forever. Allowing for states as experiments and letting them suffer their consequences is good. It is a machine for us to iterate on…

When experiments fail the constituents pay the price, not the experimenters.

The constituents elect the experimenters, and generally become the experimenters thereby.

Re: Letter to Governor Abbott on responsible AI infrastructure in Texas

#32
post #11

If Virginia or Louisiana should profit by this then so be it. Californian land-use laws will have a net effect of -8 house seats against Texas. That is good. It should happen. If Texans will be poorer so Virginians will be richer, that is also good. May the American federal system reign forever. Allowing for states as experiments and letting them suffer their consequences is good. It is a machine for us to iterate on…

Virginia has more power infrastructure in place but said infrastructure is already seeing significant DC build out; I know little about power distribution in Louisiana but would be surprised if there was extensive spare capacity in the transmission lines and generation facilities. I'm surprised that the rust belt hasn't seen more uptake since they had all that manufacturing capacity but the backing power generation/d…

> I'm surprised that the rust belt hasn't seen more uptake

Oracle's doing something just outside the Milwaukee metro. I'd imagine there are others. Datacenter buildout is wildly unpopular around the Great Lakes, and that's not new. For Wisconsinites specifically, the whole thing has a whiff of Foxconn about it.

For the uninitiated: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wisconn_Valley_Science_and_Tec...

Re: Letter to Governor Abbott on responsible AI infrastructure in Texas

#33

Why can’t these idiots just mandate that you have to build out clean energy to power the data centers. It’s such a simple bit of legislation that they just will not do.

Because the federal government made it effectively illegal to build nuclear reactors, and there are no more rivers to be dammed.

[flagged]

Re: Letter to Governor Abbott on responsible AI infrastructure in Texas

#34
post #11

If Virginia or Louisiana should profit by this then so be it. Californian land-use laws will have a net effect of -8 house seats against Texas. That is good. It should happen. If Texans will be poorer so Virginians will be richer, that is also good. May the American federal system reign forever. Allowing for states as experiments and letting them suffer their consequences is good. It is a machine for us to iterate on…

Polling shows a fairly bipartisan opposition to data centers, so it could encourage more states to join in with pauses of their own.

Re: Letter to Governor Abbott on responsible AI infrastructure in Texas

#35
post #15
post #11

If Virginia or Louisiana should profit by this then so be it. Californian land-use laws will have a net effect of -8 house seats against Texas. That is good. It should happen. If Texans will be poorer so Virginians will be richer, that is also good. May the American federal system reign forever. Allowing for states as experiments and letting them suffer their consequences is good. It is a machine for us to iterate on…

When experiments fail the constituents pay the price, not the experimenters.

[dead]

Re: Letter to Governor Abbott on responsible AI infrastructure in Texas

#36

Why can’t these idiots just mandate that you have to build out clean energy to power the data centers. It’s such a simple bit of legislation that they just will not do.

Because the federal government made it effectively illegal to build nuclear reactors, and there are no more rivers to be dammed.

People will run to point to the spate of new nuclear plans, but the point be made here is that nuclear regulation is so suffocating and costs so extreme that it's "effectively illegal" to build reactors.

Re: Letter to Governor Abbott on responsible AI infrastructure in Texas

#37
post #11

If Virginia or Louisiana should profit by this then so be it. Californian land-use laws will have a net effect of -8 house seats against Texas. That is good. It should happen. If Texans will be poorer so Virginians will be richer, that is also good. May the American federal system reign forever. Allowing for states as experiments and letting them suffer their consequences is good. It is a machine for us to iterate on…

Polling shows a fairly bipartisan opposition to data centers, so it could encourage more states to join in with pauses of their own.

Well yeah nobody wants their local water supply to be either disintegrated into subatomic particles or polluted with every harmful substance known to man (whichever one they're supposed to do changes from day to day).

Re: Letter to Governor Abbott on responsible AI infrastructure in Texas

#38
post #11

If Virginia or Louisiana should profit by this then so be it. Californian land-use laws will have a net effect of -8 house seats against Texas. That is good. It should happen. If Texans will be poorer so Virginians will be richer, that is also good. May the American federal system reign forever. Allowing for states as experiments and letting them suffer their consequences is good. It is a machine for us to iterate on…

Polling shows a fairly bipartisan opposition to data centers, so it could encourage more states to join in with pauses of their own.

Tracking at:

https://aidatacentermap.org/

https://www.datacenterbans.com/

https://www.datacenterwatch.org/

https://www.brockovichdatacenter.com/

Re: Letter to Governor Abbott on responsible AI infrastructure in Texas

#39

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Polling shows a fairly bipartisan opposition to data centers, so it could encourage more states to join in with pauses of their own.

Well yeah nobody wants their local water supply to be either disintegrated into subatomic particles or polluted with every harmful substance known to man (whichever one they're supposed to do changes from day to day).

It's not just about water. It's about the noise, little to no benefit to the community besides a handful of jobs, air pollution where they're colocated gas turbines for power, and pushing up electricity prices. They are a net negative for most communities.

"Winning" in this context is simply slowing down permitting and construction until the capital bubble pops, at which point a great deal of these projects simply evaporate. And the bubble will pop eventually.

'Living in Hell': Data Center Neighbors Grapple With Noise, Air Pollution - https://www.usnews.com/news/national-news/articles/2026-04-2... - April 28th, 2026

Measuring the Impact of Data Centers in the United States Economy: Monetary Damage from Air Pollution and Greenhouse Gas Emissions - https://www.nber.org/papers/w35100 | https://doi.org/10.3386/w35100

> This paper quantifies the environmental externalities associated with electricity consumption by data centers in the United States, focusing on damages from local air pollution and greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. Using facility-level data for approximately 2,800 operational data centers in 2025, combined with electricity grid characteristics and emissions data, the analysis estimates pollution impacts through the AP4 integrated assessment model and applies the social cost of carbon for GHG valuation. Results indicate that data centers consume roughly 250 TWh of electricity—about 5–6% of U.S. generation—and generate approximately $25 billion in gross external damages (GED), with a range of $10–$33 billion. These damages are highly geographically concentrated, with Texas and Virginia accounting for 30% of the national total. While GED comprises about 5% of industry GDP, this ratio varies widely across states, exceeding GDP in some regions. Planned data center expansion could increase electricity demand and associated damages by up to 85% in the near term. Despite these environmental costs, preliminary comparisons suggest that the damages attributable to AI-related energy use are small relative to potential productivity gains. [My note: potential gains]

Health implications of the rapid rise of data centers in Virginia: an exploratory assessment - https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/climate/articles/10.338... | https://doi.org/10.3389/fclim.2026.1648912

Re: Letter to Governor Abbott on responsible AI infrastructure in Texas

#40
pittsburgh has many old power plants that are perfect for data center converts

when i go home and hear about this i'm conflicted. it brings short term economic prosperity. what's the cost if there's no commitment to clean energy in reality

the developers on these projects will do whatever it takes to simply get the project done

Post reply on HN