Hacker News Board Hacker News, browsed like a classic message board
Live data from Hacker News

DeepSeek costs OpenCode Go user $1.14/day; dual DGX breaks even in 24 years

twitter.com

Post reply on HN
Print view View original

21–30 of 68 posts

Re: DeepSeek costs OpenCode Go user $1.14/day; dual DGX breaks even in 24 years

#21

Post by infecto »

bewareofscams wrote: post #7

Beware of the author of tweet, who happens to be author of OpenCode - OpenCode will leak all your data to themselves and to shady 3rd parties. Author feigned ignorance and never fixed the issue. OpenCode among other harnesses is the shadiest of all. https://github.com/anomalyco/opencode/issues/10416

Probably less of an issue but I always disliked with their paid plan/credits that they made I nonobvious that some of the Chinese models train off of your usage. It may have changed now but they would show all these great models you could use, somewhere have a bullet that everything is private adobe have an asterisk next to a handful of those models (including their own). I am sure some cost sensitive folks are ok with that but I disliked how there was not an easy way to tell and it was opt in automatically if you used those models.

Re: DeepSeek costs OpenCode Go user $1.14/day; dual DGX breaks even in 24 years

#22

Post by infecto »

lukewarm707 wrote: post #20
bewareofscams wrote: post #7

Beware of the author of tweet, who happens to be author of OpenCode - OpenCode will leak all your data to themselves and to shady 3rd parties. Author feigned ignorance and never fixed the issue. OpenCode among other harnesses is the shadiest of all. https://github.com/anomalyco/opencode/issues/10416

agreed. when using local models, they did send your prompts to openai with 30 day retention to make the titles, silently. their recent changes to the privacy policy broke their promise of zero data retention. specifically, they offered chatgpt luna under a zero data retention privacy policy. luna was later shown to be 30 days retention. their privacy policy has never guaranteed your prompts will not be logged and whe…

Plus 100 to this. Of all the harnesses I find it to be the worst. IMO training should always require opt in and the way they continue to run their business/framework is shady.

Re: DeepSeek costs OpenCode Go user $1.14/day; dual DGX breaks even in 24 years

#23

Post by notjes »

jauntywundrkind wrote: post #2

That's almost half way to their stated 6X usage goal! Just from DeepSeek. > With Go, you pay $10/month and we aim to give you 6x that in usage. For most models, we make this work through bulk discounts and reserved GPU capacity. We then pass those savings on to you through the 6x multiplier. https://opencode.ai/docs/go/#why-some-models-have-lower-usag... I think it's back to 2X usage, meaning it's cheaper token-burn…

Since the announcement of DeepSeek price hike, I have been using MiniMax M3 and I am really surprised by the quality this model spits out. Subjectively speaking, the bullshit MM3M produces is waaay less than DS0731. Could it be a result of less hallucinations than DS0731? https://artificialanalysis.ai/evaluations/omniscience#aa-omn...

Maybe hallucination is good for prototyping and creative work, but maintaining and debugging code might be better done by a boring model?

Re: DeepSeek costs OpenCode Go user $1.14/day; dual DGX breaks even in 24 years

#24

Post by 7373737373 »

bewareofscams wrote: post #7

Beware of the author of tweet, who happens to be author of OpenCode - OpenCode will leak all your data to themselves and to shady 3rd parties. Author feigned ignorance and never fixed the issue. OpenCode among other harnesses is the shadiest of all. https://github.com/anomalyco/opencode/issues/10416

It's not even possible to delete one's account!

Re: DeepSeek costs OpenCode Go user $1.14/day; dual DGX breaks even in 24 years

#25

Post by infecto »

jauntywundrkind wrote: post #2

That's almost half way to their stated 6X usage goal! Just from DeepSeek. > With Go, you pay $10/month and we aim to give you 6x that in usage. For most models, we make this work through bulk discounts and reserved GPU capacity. We then pass those savings on to you through the 6x multiplier. https://opencode.ai/docs/go/#why-some-models-have-lower-usag... I think it's back to 2X usage, meaning it's cheaper token-burn…

Don’t forgot a number of models they have offered to you will train on your data

Re: DeepSeek costs OpenCode Go user $1.14/day; dual DGX breaks even in 24 years

#27

Post by nchmy »

notjes wrote: post #23
jauntywundrkind wrote: post #2

That's almost half way to their stated 6X usage goal! Just from DeepSeek. > With Go, you pay $10/month and we aim to give you 6x that in usage. For most models, we make this work through bulk discounts and reserved GPU capacity. We then pass those savings on to you through the 6x multiplier. https://opencode.ai/docs/go/#why-some-models-have-lower-usag... I think it's back to 2X usage, meaning it's cheaper token-burn…

Since the announcement of DeepSeek price hike, I have been using MiniMax M3 and I am really surprised by the quality this model spits out. Subjectively speaking, the bullshit MM3M produces is waaay less than DS0731. Could it be a result of less hallucinations than DS0731? https://artificialanalysis.ai/evaluations/omniscience#aa-omn... Maybe hallucination is good for prototyping and creative work, but maintaining and…

but DS prices havent increased yet... in fact, opencode go is offering an extra 2x bonus on DS Flash right now. Why switch before anything has changed?

Re: DeepSeek costs OpenCode Go user $1.14/day; dual DGX breaks even in 24 years

#28

Post by s0ss »

tokai wrote: post #18
bewareofscams wrote: post #11

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Anything of substance besides shallow dismissal and (anti)appeal to masses?

[flagged]

He’s asking you to elaborate as to why you say it’s not a big deal. Claims with reasoned arguments are more productive. Otherwise you’re just shouting hot takes without any backing. Show your work.

Re: DeepSeek costs OpenCode Go user $1.14/day; dual DGX breaks even in 24 years

#29

Post by tonyhart7 »

bewareofscams wrote: post #7

Beware of the author of tweet, who happens to be author of OpenCode - OpenCode will leak all your data to themselves and to shady 3rd parties. Author feigned ignorance and never fixed the issue. OpenCode among other harnesses is the shadiest of all. https://github.com/anomalyco/opencode/issues/10416

I guess that's why they called OpenCode

Re: DeepSeek costs OpenCode Go user $1.14/day; dual DGX breaks even in 24 years

#30

Post by hluska »

tokai wrote: post #18
bewareofscams wrote: post #11

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Anything of substance besides shallow dismissal and (anti)appeal to masses?

[flagged]

Are you capable of providing a counter argument or are you as boring as you are arrogant?
Post reply on HN