It's not perfect, but I'm optimistic this will be a useful way to teach/learn in the future.
And, to be clear, I think this will be best utilized within a group/community setting. I don't think it will replace teachers or classrooms.
61–70 of 570 posts
It's not perfect, but I'm optimistic this will be a useful way to teach/learn in the future.
And, to be clear, I think this will be best utilized within a group/community setting. I don't think it will replace teachers or classrooms.
I’ve written a skill that I basically feed what I’m looking to do, some ideas I had for accomplishing it and any other details like tech stack, etc. The skill then riffs with me, judging my ideas and suggesting alternatives. We go back and forth until something useful comes out of it. This process isn’t unlike how I do normal development. However, once agreed it breaks the work into “steps”. It then creates a tutoria…
I have done this for all my work this week and it works quite well.
For one it lets you actually query the LLM as to why, their plans give a high level not every single change and it allows you to correct it as you go and the plan will change.
God does everything have to be productized and glorified as if you’ve invented a new way of learning. Read some books!
As for how useful it is to understand thins, I believe it's still useful and hope it will continue to be.
Do you know it is free of hallucinations because you crossed checked it with the source material or because you told the LLM "don't hallucinate"
> What you get is a beautiful animation that is 100% accurate and free of hallucinations. I'm not sure I follow how this is actually guaranteed? The fact-checking process mentioned just seems to involve asking AI to review its own work.
I could certainly envision a scenario whereby review would increase reliability but not how it would every guarantee 100%, there is a pretty big logical gap there.
His other project, https://aivestor.tech/ , seems like a huge grift.
What’s everyone’s opinion on learning new tech things in this day and age? My opinion swings between positive and depressing vision of the future. I still learn new stuff, but I’m afraid it won’t have any value in a year or so. For example, I’m pretty good at optimizing low level stuff, but right now you can just ask LLMs to do so and they are pretty good at it. They will profile the code and suggest reasonable optio…
I thought LLMs were a great tool for learning new topics - perhaps even complex ones. But overtime, I have had several frustrations with this. First, I get exhausted reading LLM prose. I really don't want to read anything generated by something like Opus 5 at this point. Second, as I dive deeper, I need a way to organize the information in a useful way as I begin to branch out in many different directions. I have tri…