Live data from Hacker News

London Underground begins scanning passengers' faces

btp.police.uk

481–490 of 511 posts

Re: London Underground begins scanning passengers' faces

#481

Earlier quoted context omitted.

They can catch legitimate mistakes. I had this happen about a week ago. I scanned something, thought I heard the beep, then put it in the bag. It stopped me and replayed the video. I looked at the item list and sure enough, it didn't scan. It was an honest mistake, and the camera caught it. I rescanned it after the attendant cleared the error. I've also had it flag when it thinks there is more stuff in my cart when g…

I didn’t know the cameras did that! Very dystopian. Smart that the guy found a bypass.

Some of it is just the camera, some of it is the camera + scale. The bagging area is a big scale to make sure stuff going in the bagging area was scanned. If the weight goes up without anything being scanned, or with the wrong weight, it will raise the alarm.

I’ve run into a couple situations where I was buying something light, like a greeting card, and the scale didn’t pick it up and was preventing me from moving on… waiting for me to bag the item. I threw my keys on the platform and that signaled I bagged the item and let me move on.

Re: London Underground begins scanning passengers' faces

#482
post #363

To provide clarity, this isn't (yet) (publicly) hooked up to the whole CCTV network of London Underground stations. Instead they use these temporary portable stations you can see at the end of the linked article. I went to Victoria station where they were doing this yesterday and the police seemed quite unhappy with me taking photos of them operating the facial recognition station and confronted me almost immediately…

It's of course partly selection bias, but the number of YouTube videos where UK police are upset at someone filming in public, and not even focusing on people, is incredibly ironic.

It’s typical creepy authoritarian behavior. Want to guess how much stalking is going on?

Re: London Underground begins scanning passengers' faces

#483

Earlier quoted context omitted.

How is it not relevant in a discussion about crime?

It's isolated and out of context, at the very least it needs an indication of the proportion of foreign born people in London, a major city with a large international population. At one extreme, if the population of London happened to be almost entirely foreign born then it would seem that UK citizens are working overtime at London crime.

Only about a third of London population is White British.

Re: London Underground begins scanning passengers' faces

#484

Earlier quoted context omitted.

To add: same happened in russia around 2018 on a couple of subway stations in St.-Pete and in moscow at first the result? faster tracking and arrests of people for checks who were deemed too problematic + (i.e. with anti-war protests in 2022) the cameras were used to track or threat tracking almost everyone who protested, and lowering the load on the police by coming to the dwellings afterwards in the next several da…

It's worth pointing out this is specifically not mass tracking. LFR scans faces against an existing database of outstanding wanted suspects. If a match is made, it alerts the officers who are manning the camera there and then. It doesn't store anything that wasn't a match.

So they say, but how could you even verify it if true?

History is replete with ‘oops, I guess we left that switch on after all!’ type situations, and this is perfect for it.

Re: London Underground begins scanning passengers' faces

#485
post #53

It’s a moot point. I’m saddened at the invasion of privacy and the intrusion on an individual’s civil liberties, but anonymous travel on the London Underground died when they made bank cards and contactless the primary way to get through the barriers. I’m not saying that “this doesn’t matter because it’s slightly worse than before”. I’m saying the frog has been boiling for a long time. I don’t want people being surpr…

I personally blame all Brits since it's they who allowed their government to pass laws like the Online Safety Act and RIPA Part 2 without so much as a whimper, let alone protest.

In other countries government buildings would've been set on fire.

Re: London Underground begins scanning passengers' faces

#487

Earlier quoted context omitted.

To add: same happened in russia around 2018 on a couple of subway stations in St.-Pete and in moscow at first the result? faster tracking and arrests of people for checks who were deemed too problematic + (i.e. with anti-war protests in 2022) the cameras were used to track or threat tracking almost everyone who protested, and lowering the load on the police by coming to the dwellings afterwards in the next several da…

It's worth pointing out this is specifically not mass tracking. LFR scans faces against an existing database of outstanding wanted suspects. If a match is made, it alerts the officers who are manning the camera there and then. It doesn't store anything that wasn't a match.

The thing is, that's the start. But then it will expand. Next it will be tracking and identifying people who went to protests etc.

I don't really want to say never to these kinds of things, when the use is limited. But at the moment there doesn't seem to be any legal limit.

Further, Farage and reform are/were leading in the polls. There's a non zero chance of them getting into power, and the infrastructure is there for them to abuse.

Further, how accurate is this database of outstanding wanted suspects? I ask because I'm currently maybe on bail. Maybe, because there was a gap in between bail sign offs, the wrong person signed that, and I haven't received the latest one, so am I unknowingly supposed to have surrendered myself at the police station, and now risk getting picked up by a camera and getting arrested at the train station?

Re: London Underground begins scanning passengers' faces

#488

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I wonder, if police wanted to search your phone, can they unlock with your fingerprint against your will?

In most countries they can. Which is why you should (in a perfect world) have password or fingerprint unlock, and if you use the fingerprint, the phone wipes itself. Not even Graphene supports this.

Wouldn't that lead you to getting charged for destruction of evidence?

Re: London Underground begins scanning passengers' faces

#489

The issue with all this surveillance is that it always ends up with suppression of dissent and silencing of opposition by abusing enforcement agencies. All such surveillance should start with 24-hour live video feed of private lives of all politicians... they carry immense power and control, and thus, warrant an equally powerful monitoring and scrutiny compared to common people.

Don't forget it's constantly used to track, harass, and stalk the ex girlfriends/wives of the very fragile men in our police force.

Re: London Underground begins scanning passengers' faces

#490

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Prosperity?

Yes, prosperity. And safety. China is well above the UK in prosperity and safety.

Is that because it's actually safer or is it because they don't report crimes in an honest manner?
Post reply on HN