Earlier quoted context omitted.
Your government clearly is dysfunctional (at least the part that is supposed to serve the ordinary citizens). But look around the world and you can see that it doesn't have to be that way. Also, in the US, there are a lot of forces who see the government straight-up as the enemy and want to have it as dysfunctional as possible. It's where "starve the beast" and DOGE comes from.
Ok, but these two things are incompatible: 1. Your government clearly is dysfunctional 2. You have been brainwashed into thinking that government is bloated, corrupt and inefficient. If I believe that government is dysfunctional... then surely that belief is informed by the observation that my government is bloated, corrupt and inefficient, not due to brainwashing?
Silicon Valley misreads science fiction and undermines democracy
291–294 of 294 posts
Re: Silicon Valley misreads science fiction and undermines democracy
#292Earlier quoted context omitted.
If it is known that a lot of the marbles are pink there would have to be other colors. That means there is something to it!
I'm not sure if providing a counterargument to a point not being made is a good way to argue against a field that trains people to notice when you do that.
Re: Silicon Valley misreads science fiction and undermines democracy
#293I don’t even think most of it is deeply philosophical. They just got uberrich and now worry more about the concerns of the uberrich than the concerns they had when they were normies. Rule of law, functioning government providing services, functioning public commons, free press, freedom of speech for all, any social safety net, etc don’t matter when they are so far removed from the public they can just go buy yourself…
Re: Silicon Valley misreads science fiction and undermines democracy
#294Earlier quoted context omitted.
mind defending that? I suspect that opinion would only come from one who took philosophy 101 and stopped there. If all you took was philosophy 101, this sounds a lot more reasonable and runs right into the point made by the pos you just responded to
How would you expect me to defend it? It's my opinion. I could give you a long list of things in philosophy that I consider BS, but what good would that do? Do you really doubt that I could provide such a list? The most likely outcome of that exercise would be for you to invoke the no-true-scotsman fallacy and say, "Oh, of course those things are bullshit, but that's not real philosophy." And the fact that I can make…