261–270 of 270 posts
Earlier quoted context omitted.
That's circular reasoning, how would there be a lawsuit if customer have no way of knowing?
Sensible companies don't take that risk.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
Not really. I use Luna plenty and if this model is available in GH Copilot it would be nice to know how it compares on a cost/performance basis against models in its class.
So why did Meta compare against the Opus 5 Max, which is by far the most expensive model?
Earlier quoted context omitted.
So why did Meta compare against the Opus 5 Max, which is by far the most expensive model?
Why do they do anything? Why did they bet a gorillion dollars on VR second life? No clue, maybe this Zuckerberg guy isn’t as smart as we thought
Meta is offering a 10x discount on input ($0.10 vs. $1.25/Mtok) and 20x discount on output ($0.20 vs. $4.25/Mtok) if you opt in to let them train on your data. https://developer.meta.com/ai/models/muse-spark/
I've been surprised by the reception to this, as OpenAI, for a while now, has had free API usage when data sharing is enabled ( https://help.openai.com/en/articles/10306912-sharing-feedbac... )
Earlier quoted context omitted.
I can't understand the psychology of people who think like this. You really think a throwaway quote when Zuckerberg was a college student applies nowadays? You really think Meta would risk getting a massive (losing) lawsuit on their hands, in exchange for what? Middling amounts of training data?
Meta literally ran a man in the middle attack to spy on it's user's encrypted network traffic when they used third party apps [0]. More recently (and relevant to this issue), the engaged in industrial scale piracy to get training data for their LLMs [1]. The idea that they have changed since Zuck was a college student creeping on his female classmates and now wouldn't commit actual crimes against their own users in o…
The credulity amazes me but mixed in with the brilliant minds here are some real 'temporarily embarrassed millionaires'. It's embarrassing, all right.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
"they 'trust me'. dumb fucks." The only difference between students doing it then and professionals doing it now is the students had no positive, glaring reason to mistrust.
I can't understand the psychology of people who think like this. You really think a throwaway quote when Zuckerberg was a college student applies nowadays? You really think Meta would risk getting a massive (losing) lawsuit on their hands, in exchange for what? Middling amounts of training data?
"Dumb fucks"?
"If you need information on anyone at Harvard, just ask"?
"I'm going to fuck them [Winklevoss twins] in the ear"?
Applies nowadays? Ok, when? When he copied Snapchat into every single product? When he retracted all his messages on Facebook? (https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=16770818) When he explicitly killed Instagram (buying it) because 'they can hurt us'? Do you want more examples...?
Earlier quoted context omitted.
That's circular reasoning, how would there be a lawsuit if customer have no way of knowing?
Sensible companies don't take that risk.