Viewing profile — zxwrt
zxwrt
HN member- Joined
- Fri, Apr 15, 2022, 2:08 PM UTC
- HN karma
- 73
- Public activity
- 32 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About zxwrt
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #37958447
What a nefarious move by Hetzner and Linode. How to trust them after this?
-
comment
Comment #37802802
Don't forget to consider adding ipv6 support since you are lacking it.
-
comment
Comment #37156340
Agree. Using "free and open" is still rather deceptive.
-
comment
Comment #37154938
Yes. > ... An open source cloud that can run anywhere. > ... Open-source or managed for you. Available on GitHub under the Elastic v2 license. Taken from here: https://ubicloud.com…
-
comment
Comment #37154649
Looks like another fauxpen source, yes.
-
comment
Comment #37124230
Thanks! Do not make this mistake again!
-
comment
Comment #37120865
[flagged]
-
comment
Comment #36974177
itsfoss publication that is not directly linked in article: https://news.itsfoss.com/skiff-mail-review/ Still not deleted.
- story
-
comment
Comment #35484498
Not that excellent. They still don't have ipv6 support in 2023
-
comment
Comment #33692649
Actually, the only compiler interface that can claim to call itself a standard is POSIX c99. Everything else is too volatile to be a standard.
-
comment
Comment #33692202
These are non-standard GNU extensions, unfortunately.
-
comment
Comment #33692097
Sad that C23 didn't get symbol visibility attributes. They are very useful for libraries. Perhaps there is still a chance to get them?
-
comment
Comment #33275540
No worries
-
comment
Comment #33275217
I meant the website, yeah
-
comment
Comment #33275142
When will openbsd.org get ipv6 support?
-
comment
Comment #32844490
You can't hack the paper, but you can hack the machine, no matter how secure it is...
-
comment
Comment #32466904
> It's on their list fortunately. Do you know why they fail to implement ipv6 for years? I mean it's shame when tech-oriented website/service can't keep up with new technologies. >…
-
comment
Comment #32466572
Looking forward to ipv6!
-
comment
Comment #32303439
> To me the only downside of Meson is that it requires python but I can accommodate with that. Check out https://git.sr.ht/~lattis/muon
-
comment
Comment #32303384
I agree that disabling will-be-posix extensions in POSIX mode sounds like an extreme idea, but seriously, such strictness is the main point of the pdpmake. It ensures that implemen…
-
comment
Comment #32303286
> Is there a good source for finding strict POSIX tools rather than just go digging? Some communities(iglunix, kisslinux, carbs linux, wyvertux, oasis linux, ...) are actively rese…
-
comment
Comment #32303026
awk: nawk aka one true awk sed: sbase sed m4: https://github.com/ibara/m4
-
comment
Comment #32302965
But out-of-tree builds feature is optional, right?
-
comment
Comment #32302853
The wrong part in GNU make is that it always permit using non-posix extensions regardless of .POSIX special target, while pdpmake does not. This fact makes pdpmake kinda special si…