Live data from Hacker News

Viewing profile — zxwrt

zxwrt

HN member
Joined
Fri, Apr 15, 2022, 2:08 PM UTC
HN karma
73
Public activity
32 items

About zxwrt

No profile information was provided.

Recent public activity

  1. comment
    Comment #37958447

    What a nefarious move by Hetzner and Linode. How to trust them after this?

  2. comment
    Comment #37802802

    Don't forget to consider adding ipv6 support since you are lacking it.

  3. comment
    Comment #37156340

    Agree. Using "free and open" is still rather deceptive.

  4. comment
    Comment #37154938

    Yes. > ... An open source cloud that can run anywhere. > ... Open-source or managed for you. Available on GitHub under the Elastic v2 license. Taken from here: https://ubicloud.com…

  5. comment
    Comment #37154649

    Looks like another fauxpen source, yes.

  6. comment
    Comment #37124230

    Thanks! Do not make this mistake again!

  7. comment
    Comment #37120865

    [flagged]

  8. comment
    Comment #36974177

    itsfoss publication that is not directly linked in article: https://news.itsfoss.com/skiff-mail-review/ Still not deleted.

  9. story
  10. comment
    Comment #35484498

    Not that excellent. They still don't have ipv6 support in 2023

  11. comment
    Comment #33692649

    Actually, the only compiler interface that can claim to call itself a standard is POSIX c99. Everything else is too volatile to be a standard.

  12. comment
    Comment #33692202

    These are non-standard GNU extensions, unfortunately.

  13. comment
    Comment #33692097

    Sad that C23 didn't get symbol visibility attributes. They are very useful for libraries. Perhaps there is still a chance to get them?

  14. comment
    Comment #33275540

    No worries

  15. comment
    Comment #33275217

    I meant the website, yeah

  16. comment
    Comment #33275142

    When will openbsd.org get ipv6 support?

  17. comment
    Comment #32844490

    You can't hack the paper, but you can hack the machine, no matter how secure it is...

  18. comment
    Comment #32466904

    > It's on their list fortunately. Do you know why they fail to implement ipv6 for years? I mean it's shame when tech-oriented website/service can't keep up with new technologies. >…

  19. comment
    Comment #32466572

    Looking forward to ipv6!

  20. comment
    Comment #32303439

    > To me the only downside of Meson is that it requires python but I can accommodate with that. Check out https://git.sr.ht/~lattis/muon

  21. comment
    Comment #32303384

    I agree that disabling will-be-posix extensions in POSIX mode sounds like an extreme idea, but seriously, such strictness is the main point of the pdpmake. It ensures that implemen…

  22. comment
    Comment #32303286

    > Is there a good source for finding strict POSIX tools rather than just go digging? Some communities(iglunix, kisslinux, carbs linux, wyvertux, oasis linux, ...) are actively rese…

  23. comment
    Comment #32303026

    awk: nawk aka one true awk sed: sbase sed m4: https://github.com/ibara/m4

  24. comment
    Comment #32302965

    But out-of-tree builds feature is optional, right?

  25. comment
    Comment #32302853

    The wrong part in GNU make is that it always permit using non-posix extensions regardless of .POSIX special target, while pdpmake does not. This fact makes pdpmake kinda special si…