Viewing profile — zoren

In other lisps a let form has a body that the binding(s) range over and they are not available outside. As in `(let n 12 (+ n n))` here n wouldn't be accessible after. You have `(d…

> npx web-push generate-vapid-keys --json > vapid.json Does the trick

vapidkeys.com signs you up for their newsletter I later found

Great article, thank you for sharing! The web-push package has a generateVAPIDKeys have you tried that? Was it not good since you use vapidkeys.com?

Amazing how intelligent people think intelligence can be quantified in a single number.

Also helps if you want to hang something on the wall.

I’ll tell you one thing about useless stuff. Sometimes it turns out to be useful, only in a way you hadn’t imagined.

> The name "Steel Bank Common Lisp" is a reference to Carnegie Mellon University Common Lisp from which SBCL forked: Andrew Carnegie made his fortune in the steel industry and Andr…

I thought solar farms produced power.

Not very often and not for very long. Source: lived here 38 years.

Joseph Luft and Harrington Ingham apparently. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Johari_window

I guess you’re right. It’s also blocked here in Denmark.

In The Black Swan, Nassim Nicholas Taleb argues that applying game theory to real life situations is one instance of the ludic fallacy. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ludic_fallacy

Why would you hold 10,000 elements in a linked list?

Oh I understood you as if you where claiming we are currently in a tech bubble that will burst soon. That's why I asked when this would happen.

When will this crash come? And how do you know?

I would claim ANTLR is such a tool.

Are they? I thought parser combinators made parsing context sensitive grammars easier than when using parser generators.

True, irrational shared a first hand experience and then proceeded to speculate as if that experience was evidence that smoking is more prevalent in Canada than in the US.

Do you have numbers to back up your claim?

That is one weird array in Google's reply. Looks like it could have been an object instead, whereby JSON hijacking wouldn't be a problem.

I don't think it was intended in the formal sense either. But "minimalistic" or "small" would probably be more suitable.

Someone please remind me why the hash is not a type definition so the representation would only have to be changed in one place.

I shall have to commit my crime in cloudy weather then.