Live data from Hacker News

Viewing profile — zjs

zjs

HN member
Joined
Wed, Mar 27, 2013, 10:29 PM UTC
HN karma
149
Public activity
83 items

About zjs

[ my public key: https://keybase.io/zjs; my proof: https://keybase.io/zjs/sigs/eeEb6XShsU64Ew-eIeSBr44Vh-d-eJ3UO7S3cMylkNE ]

Recent public activity

  1. comment
    Comment #29871072

    Evil Wordle: "caver". I won after 6 guesses Y____ YY___ _____ _G_GG GG_GG GGGGG

  2. comment
    Comment #29835694

    I requested my report using the link in the OP. The only place Equifax could have gotten this information, with this granularity, is my employer. It's not just a ballpark number or…

  3. comment
    Comment #29835646

    At least in my case, the number/email they were willing to send a one-time passcode to were the ones I gave to my employer, not the ones I had entered earlier in the form.

  4. comment
    Comment #26785886

    Related: the idea of income pooling schemes amongst baseball players. "Income pooling is a concept for up and coming baseball players who would come together and contractually agre…

  5. comment
    Comment #25439978

    As a data point: I pay Google $5/month to accomplish essentially the same thing. I pay for Google Workspace, have a handful of domains configured, a single "real" user account and …

  6. comment
    Comment #25202584

    I always appreciate alternatives to using an arithmetic mean.

  7. comment
    Comment #25171986

    I haven't had success with no meeting days because it just leads to cramming more meetings into the other days that week. I suspect this would be less of a problem with a no meetin…

  8. comment
    Comment #25055619

    The PDF linked from the post clarifies the rule for PA: "Wearing a t-shirt or button supporting a candidate, campaign, or political party (except voters in the act of voting)" (Oth…

  9. comment
    Comment #25055474

    One of my favorite benefits was the ability to take a 3 month paid pseudo-sabbatical. You had to spend the time doing some sort of work, but it's flexible. It could helping another…

  10. comment
    Comment #25028775

    Let's try this differently: what would you accept as evidence that they are extremists? What evidence can you cite that they are not?

  11. comment
    Comment #25027687

    > That doesn't mean he's some secret conspiratorial white supremacist talking in code. > ... > But it's equally reprehensible to have a crowd on the sidelines chomping at the bit t…

  12. comment
    Comment #25024703

    Very cool! Some simple feature ideas: It'd be interesting to be able to use size or color to indicate additional dimension(s). I like to measure “return” in terms of impact/urgency…

  13. comment
    Comment #25024561

    > It’s the constant moving of the goal posts and redefinitions. > > Is the argument that Trump is racist or right wing? They aren’t the same. I see three points in the "grandparent…

  14. comment
    Comment #25024321

    The next day, he was asked point-blank by reporters what he meant and whether he misspoke. His response was to: 1. Say that he didn't know who the Proud Boys are. Even the most gen…

  15. comment
    Comment #25024266

    I'd be more willing to let is slide as a slip up if not for the surrounding context — both during the debate, and during the days following. The whole premise of the question ( htt…

  16. comment
    Comment #25024121

    Could you provide some sort of source or citation for this? The Southern Poverty Law Center, Anti-Defamation League, and FBI all seem to consider them extremist.

  17. comment
    Comment #25024076

    > Progressives seem to believe that Western = white, and that is how they make the leap to white supremacy in this context. I'll note that my comment did not directly link proud bo…

  18. comment
    Comment #25024058

    Please say more about the point you're making. On the surface, it's not clear how it relates to anything I said in the comment to which you've replied.

  19. comment
    Comment #25024024

    > Those networks must limit themselves to neutrally reporting the news and let the people make up their minds. Impartial coverage is important, but neutral reporting is dangerous. …

  20. comment
    Comment #25022598

    > It's been a constant stream of catastrophizing from them for the last four years. I've looked at a few definitions, and I don't see how it's an accurate description of what's hap…

  21. comment
    Comment #25022575

    > Trump will challenge the election results in court and succeed or fail. It's as simple as that. Personally, I hope it's a failure because I don't want there to have been any impr…

  22. comment
    Comment #25022372

    Which part of the statement are you disputing? That he didn't say "stand by"? That the proud boys aren't right-wing extremists? That the meaning of "stand by" was somehow misconstr…

  23. comment
    Comment #25022233

    From my perspective, the two things that people mix up are: A. Russia interfering with the election. B. Trump welcoming Russia's interference. For me, (B) is significant regardless…

  24. comment
    Comment #25001668

    There's some thoughtful analysis of the proposition from SPUR: https://www.spur.org/voter-guide/san-francisco-2020-11/prop-...

  25. comment
    Comment #24855543

    I suspect this varies widely from person-to-person, but I'll share things that I find effective. 1. Create space for thinking. Block off chunks of time. Snooze notifications. Close…