Viewing profile — zero-x

This is just silly. By these arguments even block #1 has no consensus and has not terminated. Because "it might fork" that's why it's not a consensus? lol, ok buddy.

It's quite simple really. Do all miners [eventually] agree on the value of a block? Yes? That's a consensus. True there are other types of consensus that are perhaps 'fairer' but t…

Just because it doesn't fit into your contrarian view on consensus it doesn't mean it doesn't provide consensus. Nakamoto consensus solves the Byzantine problem quite well. The lis…

The established value of the consensus is the transactions contained within the block. It's established because it's what the network accepted, regardless of individual node states…

What? There is consensus on the public blockchain every few seconds + block depth. It's called Nakamoto consensus, so yes blockchain 'solves' the problem. In smaller chains, there …

Yeah good point.

Twitter is already full of racist memes that people see. That's kinda the whole point, watch it all burn and interact with people at the rawest level.

Totally, solving that issue is the most challenging thing. A middle ground could be democratized voting where users can vote to keep or remove messages.

I think this is the antithesis of the blockchain. I think a much better idea is: "Uncensorable Twitter". With how much twitter and Google censor users they find offensive I think a…

Best of luck, really dig the platform.

Hmm, seems interesting but wondering how it compares to H2O's Sparkling Water. Been using that for clients and i love it.

Looks very interesting, have you looked at H2O.ai which spits out a classifiers as Java code which can be wrapped in an ultra low latency API without caching.

This is great advice. I'd add that the culture around data engineering projects tend to be very different. I've seen companies that treat data projects as if they were this great u…