Viewing profile — zeleza

Link to the preprint: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3830681

I agree, this is biased sample trash and Scientific American should feel bad about their reporting on this.

Not at all true, there's been a ton of study on lucid dreams. Check out a summary of the research by Jennifer Windt: https://mitpress.mit.edu/books/dreaming

If the link is "weak to non-existent" and our a priori thinking is that it should be perfectly safe, shouldn't we default to it being safe? I'm not against also running studies to …

It seems theoretically impossible for non-ionising radiation produced by 5G or any other radio emitters to cause cancer as there's no known mechanism for it to induce carcinogenic …

As always, a reminder that correlation != causation. This shows an association between hormone levels and autism, which is suggestive. But keep in mind that there may be a confound…

Cool work! If you're allowing more biological cognitive neuroscience, I'd also consider adding: -engram studies on memory, probably starting with the Liu et al 2012 paper: https://…