Viewing profile — zekica
zekica
HN member- Joined
- Mon, Jan 11, 2021, 12:08 PM UTC
- HN karma
- 750
- Public activity
- 243 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About zekica
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #49196470
xdg already provides "portals" and "XDG Intents" that implement most of what android does. Flatpak implements most of the sandboxing you have on android. It doesn't have feature pa…
-
comment
Comment #48828774
Code names for phones, all android builds (including official ones) have them. https://storage.googleapis.com/play_public/supported_devices...
-
comment
Comment #48814683
It's not Broadcom so it is supportable by OpenWrt. It runs Qualcomm IPQ5332 SoC which recently got supported in upstream linux ath12k drivers... There are a few patches to make it …
-
comment
Comment #48502668
N95 was not "meager" for it's time - it was faster than the first iPhone.
-
comment
Comment #47853348
Mainly because Microsoft wants to have "connected standby": the CPU is running in a low power mode (not powered off like "old" S3 sleep), can be turned on periodically and can turn…
-
comment
Comment #47796615
This post is everything wrong with the world today. Installing software should not be gate-kept. Who's to say that some current or future government in the US wouldn't use the data…
-
comment
Comment #47663683
And it can fail in great ways. Last example: I asked claude for a non-trivial backup and recovery script using restic. I gave it the whole restic repo and it still made up paramete…
-
comment
Comment #47648999
I think this is a snap issue.
-
comment
Comment #47618292
And they are the only real solution. Demand fitting production is never going to work unless we give up all the autonomy.
-
comment
Comment #47604822
SNI routing is such a bad way to do what should be L3 problem that people implemented PROXY protocol to send information about user's endpoint address without doing MITM.
-
comment
Comment #47604782
All desktop/mobile OSes today use "Stable privacy addresses" for inbound traffic (only if you are hosting something long-term) and "Temporary addresses" for outbound traffic and P2…
-
comment
Comment #47604733
You can do fc00::/7 in addition to public addresses so your lights don't have public address while your phone does.
-
comment
Comment #47604713
And the worst part about CGNAT is that you have two bad solutions: Either EIM/EIF (preferably with hairpinning) where you can practically do direct connections but you have to limi…
-
comment
Comment #47604640
Trivially easy do direct connections between devices (if desired), no issues when creating VPNs between networks using private ranges. What would be the disadvantage?
-
comment
Comment #47604628
Temporary addresses are used by any Linux distro using NetworkManager (all desktop ones). For server distros, it can differ.
-
comment
Comment #47552502
.docx and .xlsx are also just zip files with XML and attachments. The bad thing is that the XML is Word's internal document structure serialized and behavior for some values is onl…
-
comment
Comment #47487762
Even gcc's -O0 will do the bitshift, but even dividing with 5 on x86_64 will not do idiv: imul rdx, rdx, 1717986919 shr rdx, 32 sar edx sar eax, 31 sub edx, eax mov eax, edx
-
comment
Comment #47347037
Minor nitpick: dynamic memory allocation is not used when processing packets, but is when adding/removing clients via netlink.
-
comment
Comment #47177745
Yes, VLAN isolation prevents this - devices in different VLANs use different GMK keys even when connected to the same network.
-
comment
Comment #47168200
This only works for one SSID. Even then, one thing that can mitigate this is using Private-PSK/Dynamic-PSK on WPA2, or using EAP/Radius VLAN property. On WPA3/SAE this is more comp…
-
comment
Comment #46932017
You can't think all the way about refining your prompt for LLMs as they are probabilistic. Your re-prompts are just retrying until you hit a jackpot - refining only works to increa…
-
comment
Comment #46744204
Only if that authenticator/password manager app is not end-to-end encrypted.
-
comment
Comment #46675689
Both. LGPL doesn't distinguish between commercial and non-commercial use.
-
comment
Comment #46174856
They have different goals: GrapheneOS wants to make a FOSS Android with the security model that makes it hard for any bad party to break into the phone. LineageOS wants to make a F…
-
comment
Comment #46108103
Interesting... I rarely form words in my inner thinking, instead I make a plan with abstract concepts (some of them have words associated, some don't). Maybe because I am multiling…