Viewing profile — zaphar
zaphar
HN member- Joined
- Wed, Aug 12, 2009, 1:04 AM UTC
- HN karma
- 8,112
- Public activity
- 2,518 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About zaphar
[ my public key: https://keybase.io/zaphar; my proof: https://keybase.io/zaphar/sigs/EBb9qSOchK8pT3zTsPnikv8z0ot6Af5Av8l-xffn6Bk ]
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #49249904
That was not my understanding at all. She seemed to be making a much more nuanced point than the simplistic: "selfish actors deliberately dismantle..". I was more responding to the…
-
comment
Comment #49249412
This is a statement of nearly pure faith not fact. Which is fine. I have a lot of things I believe based in pure faith. The difference is that I don't state them as if they were fa…
-
comment
Comment #49249187
I donate to this software because it's so much fun to play around with. My wife (of 30 years as of today) knows way more about music than I do and this is one way for me to connect…
-
comment
Comment #49248912
I think you might be thinking about Elinor Ostrom and she didn't show that his assumptions and claims were wrong exactly. She expanded on the work to clarify the difference between…
-
comment
Comment #49243160
Comparing a languages syntax to a saw blade is a bad analogy. A saw is a complete tool. Syntax is more like the teeth on the saw blade. The quality of the saw is not just about the…
-
comment
Comment #49214822
Please do this. I would love to see this timeline actually hold true. Production quality is the bar though. Not something that only works in a very narrow set of circumstances with…
-
comment
Comment #49214788
The Oracle antipathy is less about the policy itself and more about the apparent hypocrisy of hyping and funding these tools as "solving programming" and then forbidding their use …
-
comment
Comment #48933205
As far as I can tell that is indeed, "it". What is maybe more interesting is that it took this long to find data that shows it wrong given we have so many examples in history of it…
-
comment
Comment #48933092
This is sort of correct on webkits side. inheritance chains especially when you don't control who is inheriting from you are going to be very brittle. The standard would probably h…
-
comment
Comment #48933023
In the spec custom elements can inherit from any html element you wish. Which should allow you to only have to add the bits you need to add and let the rest be handled by the nativ…
-
comment
Comment #48860899
I do know quite a few people who use vim because they do enjoy the puzzle. So there are absolutely people as he describes. Saying that there aren't people like that just undermines…
-
comment
Comment #48859507
The article was not against a tool but a way of thinking. He didn't say anywhere that Sublime was better than Vim. He did say that he disagrees with the idea that a tools friction …
-
comment
Comment #48844491
The catch-22 here is that you still save money using Claude Code directly here if you are on one of their subscription plan due to how heavily they are subsidizing that. Using Pi m…
-
comment
Comment #48662315
I think it's quite fine to acknowledge that you pushed someone or some group of people to hard as a leader. A genre defining game is not the sort of thing that deserves wrecking so…
-
comment
Comment #48585564
Web developers are not magically worse at this than native devs. See: much of the windows OS lately. The performance of a web view app is more to do with the quality of the devs th…
-
comment
Comment #48492997
I'm aware. I worked on that specific project (assuming we are talking about the same one) back in the day. :-) There are certainly very large applications in that repo in the hundr…
-
comment
Comment #48491680
That's a monorepo with hundreds if not thousands of different applications. It's not even close to an apples to apples comparison.
- comment
-
comment
Comment #48484722
I think it's more that I was putting emphasis on a different piece of the puzzled than you and less that we disagreed.
-
comment
Comment #48484698
This framing I agree with.
-
comment
Comment #48484690
They have been able to "so far". This isn't to say that we shouldn't learn from them how to push the failure date as far into the future as you can. I just don't think you can trul…
-
comment
Comment #48480913
Like a lot of things, bad actors only have to get you to fail the test of succession once while the company has to succeed at it every time. Time is not on any companies side here …
-
comment
Comment #48480860
The structure requires maintenance and that is done by an individual or individuals. The real reasons a good company stays good is because the leadership stays good. When the leade…
-
comment
Comment #48398947
The correct solution for most users of Claude is to refuse to do things like: `performing logins, handling credentials on behalf of the user, etc`. It is not to find a way to hand …
-
comment
Comment #48398850
Sure. But I'm also not going to assume they will just because this they seem to sort of mimic it now.