Viewing profile — zackchase
zackchase
HN member- Joined
- Thu, Nov 01, 2012, 8:13 PM UTC
- HN karma
- 221
- Public activity
- 42 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About zackchase
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #25286006
That's not quite right. Salary bands tend to be guidelines, not constraints. And in ML there are plenty of people getting paid far out of band.
- story
- story
-
comment
Comment #19186407
I assure you, people have pointed it out...
- story
-
comment
Comment #17502566
Thanks for sharing! Happy to discuss here if anyone wants to engage in some (pre)debate. Also happy to butt out :).
-
comment
Comment #17027967
These are excellent questions. I often ask Google researchers, "How Deep is the Mind?" They don't seem to know. You see, it all comes down to democratizing the blockchain, and the …
-
comment
Comment #17027881
Thanks for the interest in JnJ AGI Research! As inter-global head of research I'm happy to answer any questions the HN community may have!
- story
-
comment
Comment #14908871
Flag-planting is relevant because the practice of flag-planting (and other abuses of the pre-print) is what has prompted some of this over-reaction.
-
comment
Comment #14908425
Author here: Grisha Perelman's proof of the Poincaré conjecture has never been (by him, to my knowledge) submitted to or published in any journal. He decided, as is his right, that…
- story
- story
-
comment
Comment #13981794
It's problematic that the "experts in AGI" are generally self-designated, and have mostly produced little that is concrete, either in the form of theory or engineering. We should b…
-
comment
Comment #13974911
While I don't take exception with the word machine learning (it's reasonably well defined), I agree with most of the points here. Some are grossly exaggerated (e.g. needing petabyt…
-
comment
Comment #13974888
As someone with an economics background (BA), and medical research career (concurrent with ML), I can say (subjectively), that this feels different.
-
comment
Comment #13974314
I generally agree with this. I used machine learning almost exclusively in the article. Yet "AI misinformation" seems more appropriate in the title since the misinformation, genera…
-
comment
Comment #13973975
Some strident Singularitarians joined the comment thread.
-
comment
Comment #13973838
Some strident Singularitarians have joined the comment thread.
- story
-
comment
Comment #13272442
The performance improvement over
-
comment
Comment #13183895
The performance of multilayer perceptrons and linear models is significant. The paper additionally allows the MLP and linear models to "cheat" by giving them heavily hand-engineere…
-
comment
Comment #12533292
The two statements here may be factually true. 1) You had a hard time. 2) Your female classmates, all else being equal, did better. But there's something unsettling about the impli…
-
comment
Comment #12125696
These are strong arguments. Unfortunately, while sometime interpretability addresses a fundamental (not frivolous concern), it's also true that often interpretability is sometimes …
-
comment
Comment #12125671
I have good reason to believe the paper's author agrees with this argument.