Viewing profile — zR0x
zR0x
HN member- Joined
- Tue, Aug 10, 2021, 12:38 AM UTC
- HN karma
- -4
- Public activity
- 18 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About zR0x
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #28149930
Do we need scrollbars? What about popping the cell into a tab or overlay like we do with images, Apples 3D Touch I want to drill into specifics, not fiddle with scrollbars, which j…
-
comment
Comment #28148781
What’s legitimate is subjective. Rand Paul is too much of a troll to be given legitimacy
-
comment
Comment #28148685
He’s just polluting the airwaves to keep his voters wound up. A single layer of cloth doesn’t stop it. There’s a reason why those scarfs aren’t allowed in airplanes (well they say …
-
comment
Comment #28148273
We can’t create enough material machines for everyone that wants to code to code. If that’s dystopian, wait until you hear about your impending natural death. I can sit by a tree a…
-
comment
Comment #28148232
Them HN commenting standards…
-
comment
Comment #28138626
Wait until he learns about the predictions that go back to 1860s: https://daily.jstor.org/how-19th-century-scientists-predicte...
-
comment
Comment #28138498
The reason they want us in offices is real property is the root of power. If they don’t own all that land they lose influence locally. They can’t put on spectacle in their “stadium…
-
comment
Comment #28138434
Property owners are human members of society They’re not above participating in solving human problems You want to live in a bubble, go off grid None of us get up and contribute to…
-
comment
Comment #28135238
90% of communication for humans is body language and sensory cues. It’s not hard for me to see how our language faculty convinced past humans we were somehow masters of reality bey…
-
comment
Comment #28134812
Yep. Babies can add and subtract when they’re days old. Can they write Shakespeare? If human language is fundamental, how is it missing from the start? Are we learning language or …
-
comment
Comment #28132215
Yes. It’s emergent behavior of a physical universe that has no meaning. It just is. “Meaning to us” is subjective. That’s how we have conflicting theories in many fields. Science i…
-
comment
Comment #28130515
Yeah, same experience. We had to write our own “terraform” like tooling to make use of it (retry loops and the like). It has (had? This was a couple years ago) no awareness, for ex…
-
comment
Comment #28130119
Sure there is more going on than we see on the surface. Before neuroscience and modern imaging we needed to sit and imagine and theorize. Now we don’t.
-
comment
Comment #28129982
Religion shows we can create very detailed belief in ornate ideas that are scientifically nonsensical. It’s possible the concepts linguists seek to develop are similarly self reinf…
-
comment
Comment #28125085
I don’t understand how we don’t? I make sound snapping my fingers. Whistling. Why is it so hard to accept mirror neurons fired when early humans heard birds and animals, each other…
-
comment
Comment #28124410
Agreed. The pattern matching part is easy. That’s what bores me about math. How can it help me reason about reality is the interesting part. For that, one has to really practice th…
-
comment
Comment #28124322
We had to learn to collaborate before “language”. Perhaps thinking language is a key aspect of consciousness is wrong. Chomsky has said human languages themselves are just random s…
-
comment
Comment #28124078
If it’s just stats why do I need Google? I can write code to bubble up stats across text sources in any language. I’m reminded of a behind the scenes video of Batman 1989, where th…