Viewing profile — yxdfasdjkljasdf

Judging from the article it does: The author is clearly Apple and they are not responsible just as in the BSD license: The Capitan is AS-IS, of course. Unlike BSD, there is no sour…

Which is what Apple's license says, but with a bunch of additional terms unfavorable for the user and without access to the source code.

When you say "That is not how HTTP works" it suggests that your claim is that anything that HTTP allows is ethically OK to do. However that is clearly a ridiculous stance, since a …

(Each line responds to a paragraph in order) Appeal to fear. No comment. No being able to determine a right cause doesn't prove a wrong. Loaded question.

I fail to see a problem you are trying to present. Even if identification was hard, which is not true because of how HTTP works, it is irrelevant because HTTP doesn't discriminate.…

There is a clear distinction in the two. You are presenting a straw-man argument.

That is not how HTTP works; your analogy is not correct. Nobody is taking anything. If you don't want someone to access your page, then don't respond to their request.

That's just wrong. You haven't explained how is it wrong and why. None of those thing are "wrong" by itself. It is the malicious use, of any tool, that is unethical. Is there a web…