Viewing profile — yumong
yumong
HN member- Joined
- Tue, May 14, 2024, 5:12 AM UTC
- HN karma
- 36
- Public activity
- 16 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About yumong
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #40409362
I'm aware that that's the theory. But if it's really promising and ready and I care enough then I'll notice anyway.
-
comment
Comment #40407632
I'm still trying to wrap my head around what this tool is achieving. Running filters on many files? Does this mean that your business dies if the original tool gains the ability (a…
-
comment
Comment #40407299
Never in my life have I signed up on a waitlist. And nobody else I know ever has. I have enough spam in my inbox, why actively invite more?
-
comment
Comment #40389036
[flagged]
-
comment
Comment #40389023
And Second Life and Myspace.
-
comment
Comment #40389012
Stephen Wolfram pushes this to the extreme. Surprised that nobody mentioned him yet.
-
comment
Comment #40388998
From an evolutionary perspective, wouldn't we expect to have developed a way to "reset" parts of our brain then?
-
comment
Comment #40388957
Do we have aby indication that that's true? They are trying (and apparently succeeded) to sell something that's quite obviously fake. Whatever else they claim should be viewed in t…
-
comment
Comment #40388935
I recommend Lex Friedman's podcast's episode with Matthew Cox.
-
comment
Comment #40386999
From somebody who paid more than that 20 years ago?
-
comment
Comment #40386895
The assumption was that a trusted third party exists. Since you trust it, by definition, you can contact it to confirm authenticity of the certificate.
-
comment
Comment #40386873
They bought it for 3000 DM and then sell it for less than half that price over 20 years later?
-
comment
Comment #40386840
I'd also ask how come a single binder would suffice for 10 years of bills.
-
comment
Comment #40386823
And the locally used abbreviation for the currency at the time was DM, not DEM. For close to $1000, a little bit of effort is not unexpected. (Also, why assume this was a guy?)
-
comment
Comment #40383149
"x% chance dying of the flu" has two vastly different meanings. "If you die, then the cause of death is to 2.5% the flu" is one meaning. Likely close to correct. "With 2.5% you wil…
-
comment
Comment #40351824
[dead]