Viewing profile — youareawesome
youareawesome
HN member- Joined
- Tue, Feb 26, 2019, 3:23 PM UTC
- HN karma
- 114
- Public activity
- 32 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About youareawesome
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #27726926
Regardless of whether or not the output of Copilot is sufficiently "crow-like," the reality is that Copilot would not exist without its corpus of largely GPL-licensed code. Trainin…
-
comment
Comment #21695763
Agree, it's not new, and I think GP's point is that event-driven is the norm for the kernel and why kernel-level interfaces are efficient. What's new here is that this is being mad…
-
comment
Comment #21694077
Loading BPF requires root, so does loading kernel modules. I.e. if you have permissions to load BPF, you can already load arbitrary code.
-
comment
Comment #21660854
This is easily solved using the Lambert W function: Observe: W(x * e ^ x) = x x ^ x = y ln(x ^ x) = ln(y) ln(x) * x = ln(y) ln(x) * e ^ ln(x) = ln(y) W(ln(x) * e ^ ln(x)) = W(ln(y)…
-
comment
Comment #21619056
Joel is a family friend. I personally don't know him very well but I remember a great demonstration of his encyclopedic knowledge of the classics at my bar mitzvah. Great to see hi…
-
comment
Comment #20769063
This is great, thank you!
-
comment
Comment #20768525
I've gotten a vasectomy exactly because it's clear that some of the worst outcomes of human-created climate change are inevitable, and I recommend anyone who cares about the enviro…
-
comment
Comment #20711309
The 1A is about freedom to express any idea or opinion, not about literally publishing or saying whatever you want. Purposeful lying, for instance, is not covered under 1A. Finding…
-
comment
Comment #20483993
Many years ago, My TA in 6.034 for some reason gave me a C for the semester. This made no sense because I was 80% sure I was supposed to get an A. I was hesitant to get in touch wi…
-
comment
Comment #20288588
Yes, everyone will eventually be equally poor and dependent on the government. Sounds great
-
comment
Comment #20288561
Because one is just cynical pandering to non-rich people and an increase in government power at the expense of liberty while the other is actually effective at reducing poverty, re…
-
comment
Comment #20281094
Yeah, so then let's eliminate the next 100, and so on and so forth until everyone is penniless.
-
comment
Comment #20281069
These statistics don't tell the whole story and often are misleading. While increasing the number of welfare recipients may decrease poverty stats for paper-pushing bureaucrats, on…
-
comment
Comment #20279368
The IRS only enforces tax collection on the wealthiest individuals because it isn't efficient to do otherwise, that's why you see most of the tax revenue coming from the wealthy. T…
-
comment
Comment #20279301
After that first year there would be no one left to tax, so how would you sustain your government's revenue long term?
-
comment
Comment #20279295
Yeah I don't think increasing welfare is really the solution to ending poverty. Lots of evidence that welfare actually prolongs poverty, not to mention the waste endemic to bureauc…
-
comment
Comment #20278893
This doesn't apply to everyone, only about 80K people who hold more than $50M in assets.
-
comment
Comment #20278868
Do you really think an extra $100B-$200B added to federal revenue of currently ~$3.6T (5%) will have any noticeable effect on poverty?
-
comment
Comment #20278770
Just because it's not literally applicable doesn't mean it's meaningless, it emphasizes an important point that people overlook. The amount of wealth held by the top 80K is a drop …
-
comment
Comment #20278724
This is not an income tax, this is a wealth tax. Very different. You're taxed on money you are simply holding.
-
comment
Comment #20278680
I never brought up the top 1% and the top 1% has nothing to do with the wealth tax. The wealth tax will apply to all Americans with assets over $50 million, which is roughly ~80K p…
-
comment
Comment #20278654
Taxation is well-acknowledged a trade-off between liberty and social responsibility. This is a new type of tax that has never been implemented in the US. If the goal is to reduce p…
-
comment
Comment #20278576
Only those with more than 50 million in total assets will be paying a "wealth tax" according to Liz Warren's plan, everyone else won't be paying. I never claimed the top 1% is just…
-
comment
Comment #20278530
If you took the total combined wealth of the wealthiest 100 Americans, you wouldn't be able to fund the federal government for more than half a year or so. Taxing the rich sounds n…
- comment