Live data from Hacker News

Viewing profile — yc-kjh

yc-kjh

HN member
Joined
Sun, Dec 08, 2013, 4:16 AM UTC
HN karma
51
Public activity
35 items

About yc-kjh

No profile information was provided.

Recent public activity

  1. comment
    Comment #7452618

    Thank you for correcting me on Nagel's name. I'm embarrassed that I misspelled it, cuz his book is right in front of me.

  2. comment
    Comment #7452610

    > Please give me a definition of "meaning" that can be applied to a human brain and not to a computer. You associate a meaning to the symbol "dog". You think of an animal that bark…

  3. comment
    Comment #7452601

    No, I'm not begging the question. In another response, I readily admit that if materialism is true, then AI is a foregone conclusion. Please prove that mere electromagnetism can ca…

  4. comment
    Comment #7452595

    I think that "qualia" is the wrong question. Please see my other comments on this story.

  5. comment
  6. comment
    Comment #7452549

    You apparently don't understand how computers work. There is no "meaning" associated with any variable or its value, and there cannot be.

  7. comment
    Comment #7452544

    I am not agreeing with your argument, but let me play devil's advocate. If somebody wanted to produce a real AI, every bit as intelligent as a human, he probably wouldn't go wrong …

  8. comment
    Comment #7452505

    > I think you ought to try Julian Jaynes' Origin of Consciousness in the Brakdown of the Bicameral Mind. Thanks. I'll buy it and read it.

  9. comment
    Comment #7452502

    Au contraire. Since electromagnetism cannot cause intentions, or goals, and since the human obviously has both intentions and goals (teleology), it is clear that the human brain do…

  10. comment
    Comment #7452496

    If you accept materialism as true, then by the Church-Turing hypothesis it is a necessary and foregone conclusion that computers will achieve full human intelligence, and even more…

  11. comment
    Comment #7452473

    Read, and then critique, Nagle's recent book: http://www.Amazon.com/Mind-Cosmos-Materialist-Neo-Darwinian-... Please come back and post your response here, or start a new Hacker-Ne…

  12. comment
    Comment #7452467

    > But there are some things which are philosophical, yet not scientific I think you are wrong here as well. There is an entire branch of philosophy dedicated to the study of what w…

  13. comment
    Comment #7452438

    It is obviously not a waste when we use computers to do syntax. Chess-playing computers can now beat the best international grandmasters; this is an example of computers doing synt…

  14. comment
    Comment #7452424

    The Ph.D. degree is all about philosophy, no matter what field it is in. There is nothing which is scientific (dealing with knowledge in general, according to the Latin roots of th…

  15. comment
    Comment #7452365

    Don't just vote me down. Give reasons. Critique my arguments. Critique Searle and Nagle, whom I cite. (You have to have read their corpus first.) Voting my comment down without giv…

  16. comment
    Comment #7452341

    Idiocy: My thermostat has three possible beliefs: 1) It is too warm in here. 2) It is too cold in here. 3) It is just about right. Minsky is wrong about AI in the same way that McC…

  17. comment
    Comment #7413375

    The Asus model 1015E does not let you disable Restricted Boot, nor does it allow you to re-enable Legacy Boot. I don't have direct proof or experience, but I understand that many o…

  18. comment
    Comment #7413142

    I don't blog.

  19. comment
    Comment #7412870

    Asus does not support disabling Restricted Boot for their model 1015E.

  20. comment
    Comment #7412837

    OpenBSD doesn't support UEFI, and will never boot from it. UEFI (better called Restricted Boot) takes away the user's freedom. I want to own my hardware. I don't want the manufactu…

  21. comment
    Comment #7412817

    Microsoft deserves the blame. They require UEFI (more accurately called Restricted Boot) for Windows 8.

  22. comment
    Comment #7412804

    It used to be the case that Linux just ran on everything, until Microsoft started throwing their monopoly weight around again , and insisting upon UEFI (better called "Restricted B…

  23. comment
    Comment #7412760

    OpenBSD does not support UEFI, and probably never will. http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.os.openbsd.misc/196288 Please note that OpenBSD has no problem handling large disks, greate…

  24. comment
    Comment #7412640

    something unexpected will happen long before 202 million years from now.

  25. comment