Viewing profile — ya_throw
ya_throw
HN member- Joined
- Thu, Dec 16, 2021, 6:49 AM UTC
- HN karma
- 142
- Public activity
- 81 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About ya_throw
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #30126471
>What do you think causes viral pneumonia? Clue's in the name. A respiratory virus, of which there are many. >covid-19 variants are generally more contagious than the flu, so mask …
-
comment
Comment #30126074
I don't think you understand how the maths works. The EROEI of nuclear is 106, by the link I previously provided. The very best solar installations have an EROEI of 7. That means n…
-
comment
Comment #30125980
Not sure how you can say that, when almost every comment I've ever made to you has had some kind of calculation in it. Sounds like it is you who is attempting to dismiss arguments …
-
comment
Comment #30125697
Just fine, if you're happy with approximately 1/4th the energy output for a given (manufacturing) energy input. And that's for the best case, for certain wind power installations. …
-
comment
Comment #30124147
There absolutely is - it's called energy returned on energy invested.
-
comment
Comment #30124146
I don't even care about the cost of the land, it's the mind-boggling amount of solar panels that would need to be manufactured to fill it. Have a think about how the panels would g…
-
comment
Comment #30124129
I already did. We will never be able to find out how many people specifically died of Covid, and how many died of a viral pneumonia, thanks to the changes in death reporting guidel…
-
comment
Comment #30119663
Do you really think that our current lifestyle is at all sustainable, without using nuclear power? So far, you have suggested that we build several 1000 square miles of solar panel…
-
comment
Comment #30119623
Now there's where we get into interesting territory. The UK significantly relaxed regulations around March 2020, and basically made it very easy to put "Covid" on death certificate…
-
comment
Comment #30114816
Fascinating argument, but unfortunately, we are doomed. That is, unless we go nuclear. Apart from that, there is nowhere near enough energy or resources to maintain our current lif…
-
comment
Comment #30114586
Do you have a source for that? Assuming we use the hydrogen conversion process you mentioned, and have fitted the 1000's of square miles of solar panels it would need - I find it h…
-
comment
Comment #30114504
Which will make fuel much more expensive, and thus less consumed (which is really what is needed). Obviously that will also mean poor people can't travel very far, but what are you…
-
comment
Comment #30114384
Using the advertised final cost of electricity is, in my opinion, a useless way to work out the sustainability of any power source. It is skewed beyond usefulness by government inc…
-
comment
Comment #30114195
Arguably the Amazon rainforest isn't competing with food supply, at least on a global scale. The UK has only just started reversing the almost complete deforestation it experienced…
-
comment
Comment #30114172
Generating 500g hydrogen requires 25kWh (and a perfectly-efficient electrolyser would require 20kWh). One gallon of fuel has about 40kWh of energy available. To put it another way …
-
comment
Comment #30114107
It's bogus that jet fuel can be renewable, at least in anywhere near the quantity we currently use. Mainly because the amount of arable land needed is staggering, and we already ar…
-
comment
Comment #30113345
How much hydrogen do you need (eg, per final gallon of jet fuel), and where does that come from?
-
comment
Comment #30113331
By "article", you mean "marketing blub from someone trying to sell you something". Ultimately, all of those "sustainable" feedstocks will have to be grown. As my quick maths points…
-
comment
Comment #30113257
>They'd also know that pretty much the only condition we're treating nowadays is Covid. Do you have a source for that? The percentage of Covid patients in ICU wards in the UK peake…
-
comment
Comment #30113236
The UK Government Covid death statistics literally say "deaths with Covid", and are defined as "deaths within 28 days of a positive test". So it is true, and always has been. https…
-
comment
Comment #30113187
This is completely bogus. The ever-increasing global demand for soy foodstock is already accelerating the destruction of tropical rainforests - how is it all sustainable to burn hu…
-
comment
Comment #30069644
Who gets to decide the "legitimacy" of a chain? Some document, or the participants?
-
comment
Comment #30064246
Practically all of our "green" solutions rely on the fact that their energy-intensive manufacturing is done somewhere with lots of cheap (and polluting) energy sources. Show me a w…
-
comment
Comment #30055076
How much electricity does this contraption need to generate, before it's accounted for its own embodied energy (that is, the power needed to manufacture it)? Probably more than any…
-
comment
Comment #30050453
1. I absolutely hate the chatty style when it's used to spread the description of a js API over many tedious pages, let alone when it's used for a scientific subject like this one.…